Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Constrictive pericarditis: its history and current status

N O Fowler1

  • 1Department of Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio, 45267, USA.

Clinical Cardiology
|June 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

PRIMARY MYOCARDIAL DISEASE (HEART MUSCLE DISEASE, CARDIOMYOPATHY).

A listing of research in the cardiovascular field·2014
Same author

DIAGNOSTIC AND TREATMENT FACILITIES--COMMUNITY SERVICES.

A listing of research in the cardiovascular field·2014
Same author

Splenomegaly in congestive heart failure.

Annals of internal medicine·2010
Same author

Clinical problem-solving: a broken heart.

The New England journal of medicine·1996
Same author

Pulsus paradoxus.

Heart disease and stroke : a journal for primary care physicians·1994
Same author

Cardiac tamponade. A clinical or an echocardiographic diagnosis?

Circulation·1993

Diagnosing constrictive pericarditis is challenging due to its similarity to restrictive cardiomyopathy. Recent advances in imaging and Doppler studies aid in differentiating these conditions.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Constrictive pericarditis diagnosis is challenging, often confused with restrictive cardiomyopathy.
  • Similar physical findings and hemodynamics complicate differentiation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent advances in differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy.
  • To highlight the role of various diagnostic modalities.

Main Methods:

  • Review of clinical history, physical examination, and radiologic findings.
  • Analysis of echocardiographic, echo-Doppler, nuclear ventriculogram, and angiocardiogram results.
  • Evaluation of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for pericardial thickness.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Echocardiographic Doppler studies of flow velocity patterns show diagnostic value.
  • Nuclear ventriculograms and angiocardiograms suggest faster ventricular filling in constrictive pericarditis.
  • Pericardial thickening (>3 mm) on CT/MRI, combined with characteristic hemodynamics, confirms constrictive pericarditis.

Conclusions:

  • Advanced imaging and Doppler techniques improve the differentiation between constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy.
  • Endomyocardial biopsy is useful for specific restrictive cardiomyopathy diagnoses.