Related Experiment Videos
Variability of grip strength during isometric contraction
A H Fairfax1, R Balnave, R D Adams
1Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia.
Ergonomics
|September 1, 1995
Summary
Measures of grip strength variability are unreliable for determining sincerity of effort. The coefficient of variation (CV) is unstable across test occasions and unfairly misclassifies females, necessitating further research.
Area of Science:
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomechanics
- Ergonomics
Background:
- Measures of strength variability are increasingly used to assess sincerity of effort in medico-legal and rehabilitation contexts.
- The reliability and stability of these variability measures over time and across different conditions have not been well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the trial-to-trial variability of grip strength under maximal and submaximal effort conditions.
- To determine the test-retest reliability of the coefficient of variation (CV) for grip strength.
- To identify factors influencing grip strength variability, including effort level and gender.
Main Methods:
- Two studies were conducted involving 63 and 40 subjects, respectively, performing maximal (100%) and submaximal (50%) grip efforts.
- Grip strength was measured using a Jamar hand dynamometer, with the coefficient of variation (CV) calculated for every three repeat measures.
- Testing was performed on two separate occasions to assess interoccasion reliability of both grip strength and CV.
Main Results:
- Grip strength demonstrated very high interoccasion reliability, but the CV showed poor stability with reliability indices near zero.
- Submaximal effort levels resulted in significantly larger CVs compared to maximal effort.
- Females exhibited greater strength variability (higher CVs) than males.
- A 7.5% CV cut-off for indicating submaximal effort would misclassify 97% of females and 64% of males tested at maximal effort.
Conclusions:
- The coefficient of variation (CV) for grip strength is not a stable measure across test occasions.
- Current cut-off values for CV may unfairly discriminate against females due to inherent gender differences in strength variability.
- Further research is essential to understand factors influencing CV and to establish its validity as a clinical tool for assessing sincerity of effort.