Related Experiment Videos
Intranasal insulin therapy: the clinical realities
J Hilsted1, S Madsbad, A Hvidberg
1Department of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Diabetologia
|June 1, 1995
Summary
Intranasal insulin therapy for diabetes showed low bioavailability and poor metabolic control compared to subcutaneous injections. This method is not a viable alternative for patients at this time.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Metabolic Disorders
- Drug Delivery Systems
Background:
- Diabetes mellitus management relies on effective insulin delivery.
- Subcutaneous insulin injections are the current standard of care.
- Exploring alternative insulin delivery methods is crucial for patient convenience and adherence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of intranasal insulin versus subcutaneous insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes.
- To evaluate metabolic control, including haemoglobin A1c levels.
- To assess safety parameters such as hypoglycaemia frequency and nasal mucosa physiology.
Main Methods:
- An open, crossover randomized trial involving 31 insulin-dependent diabetic patients.
- Patients received intranasal insulin at mealtimes for 1 month.
- Patients then received subcutaneous fast-acting insulin at meals for 1 month, with both groups using intermediate-acting insulin at bedtime.
Main Results:
- Intranasal insulin exhibited low bioavailability, requiring doses approximately 20 times higher than subcutaneous insulin.
- Metabolic control, measured by haemoglobin A1c, slightly but significantly worsened with intranasal insulin.
- Six patients were withdrawn due to metabolic dysregulation during intranasal insulin therapy; hypoglycaemia frequency was similar between groups.
Conclusions:
- Intranasal insulin demonstrated significantly lower bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy compared to subcutaneous administration.
- The observed metabolic deterioration and high failure rate render intranasal insulin an unrealistic alternative to current injection methods.
- Nasal mucosa physiology remained unaffected, but safety and efficacy concerns limit its clinical application.