Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Endodontic retreatment with halothane versus chloroform solvent

L R Wilcox1

  • 1Department of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, USA.

Journal of Endodontics
|June 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Halothane and chloroform show similar effectiveness for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment. However, chloroform offers a significantly faster retreatment time compared to halothane.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A comparison between Thermafil and lateral condensation in highly curved canals.

Journal of endodontics·2009
Same author

Effectiveness of gutta-percha removal with and without the microscope.

Journal of endodontics·2000
Same author

The relationship of root canal enlargement to finger-spreader induced vertical root fracture.

Journal of endodontics·1997
Same author

Lateral condensation of small, curved root canals: comparison of two types of accessory cones.

Journal of endodontics·1996
Same author

Examination of external apical root resorption with scanning electron microscopy.

Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics·1996
Same author

Detection of pulpal circulation in vitro by pulse oximetry.

Journal of endodontics·1996

Area of Science:

  • Endodontics
  • Dental Materials Science

Background:

  • Chloroform is a traditional solvent for gutta-percha removal in endodontic retreatment.
  • Safety concerns associated with chloroform necessitate the exploration of alternative solvents.
  • Halothane is investigated as a potential alternative solvent for endodontic retreatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of halothane versus chloroform in gutta-percha removal.
  • To evaluate and compare the time required for retreatment using halothane and chloroform.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty human mandibular premolars were obturated with gutta-percha and stored for 14 months.
  • Teeth were randomly assigned to retreatment using either halothane or chloroform.
  • Retreatment completion was assessed visually; time was recorded, and canal cleanliness was quantified using digital imaging analysis.

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant difference was found in the effectiveness of gutta-percha removal between halothane and chloroform.
  • Retreatment with chloroform was significantly faster (7.7 minutes) than with halothane (10.8 minutes).

Conclusions:

  • Halothane is an effective alternative to chloroform for gutta-percha removal in endodontic retreatment.
  • Chloroform provides a more time-efficient retreatment process compared to halothane.

Related Experiment Videos