Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

On the possible causal relation between perceived spatial orientation and induced motion

A H Reinhardt-Rutland1

  • 1Psychology Department, University of Ulster at Jordanstown, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland.

Perceptual and Motor Skills
|April 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Viewing behaviour of spider phobics and non-phobics in the presence of threat and safety stimuli.

The British journal of clinical psychology·2004
Same author

Induced rotational motion with nonabutting inducing and induced stimuli: implications regarding two forms of induced motion.

The Journal of general psychology·2003
Same author

The spectrally dependent monotic component in the decreasing-loudness aftereffect: implications for dynamic auditory localization.

The Journal of general psychology·2001
Same author

The framing effect with rectangular and trapezoidal surfaces: actual and pictorial surface slant, frame orientation, and viewing condition.

Perception·2001
Same author

Sensitivity in changing-loudness aftereffects as indicated by an adjustment procedure: implications regarding mechanisms.

The Journal of general psychology·1998
Same author

Increasing-loudness aftereffect following decreasing-intensity adaptation: spectral dependence in interotic and monotic testing.

Perception·1998

The rod-and-frame effect and frame-and-spot-induced motion grow with larger inducing frames, suggesting spatial orientation changes cause motion. However, the rod-and-frame effect may actually inhibit induced rotation.

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Spatial orientation

Background:

  • Brooks and Sherrick (1994) demonstrated that larger inducing frames amplify the rod-and-frame effect and frame-and-spot-induced motion.
  • This prior research suggested that alterations in perceived spatial orientation are the cause of induced motion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the relationship between the rod-and-frame effect and induced motion.
  • To differentiate the rod-and-frame effect from frame-and-spot-induced motion.
  • To investigate the potential inhibitory influence of the rod-and-frame effect on induced rotation.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis comparing the rod-and-frame effect with induced rotation.
  • Distinguishing key differences between frame-and-spot-induced motion and induced rotation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The rod-and-frame effect is argued to be more comparable to induced rotation than to frame-and-spot-induced motion.
  • Significant differences exist between frame-and-spot-induced motion and induced rotation.

Conclusions:

  • The rod-and-frame effect may not solely be a consequence of changing spatial orientation.
  • The rod-and-frame effect has the potential to inhibit induced rotation, contrary to previous assumptions.
  • A clearer distinction between different types of induced motion is proposed.