Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Current methods of mutation detection

R G Cotton1

  • 1Olive Miller Laboratory, Murdoch Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Vic., Australia.

Mutation Research
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Chemical cleavage of heteroduplex DNA to identify mutations.

Current protocols in human genetics·2008
Same author

Mutation detection 2001: Sixth International Symposium on Mutations in the Human Genome, May 3-7, 2001, Bled, Slovenia.

Human mutation·2001
Same author

10th International Hugo mutation database initiative meeting, 19 April 2001, Edinburgh, Scotland.

Human mutation·2001
Same author

Go!Poly: A gene-oriented polymorphism database.

Human mutation·2001
Same author

COL4A4 mutation in thin basement membrane disease previously described in Alport syndrome.

Kidney international·2001
Same author

Functional analysis, using in vitro mutagenesis, of amino acids located in the phenylalanine hydroxylase active site.

Archives of biochemistry and biophysics·2001
Same journal

Monoallelic germline RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1 variants in hereditary cancer testing: Variant spectrum and clinical counselling implications.

Mutation research·2026
Same journal

Prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma associated biomarkers in TP53 gene; A comprehensive in silico analysis.

Mutation research·2026
Same journal

IDH1 mutation promotes angiogenesis via upregulation of hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha in glial tumors.

Mutation research·2026
Same journal

Targeting overexpressed oncogenes in esophageal cancer through miRNA-mediated gene silencing: Insights from binding affinity and thermodynamic profiling.

Mutation research·2026
Same journal

The active compound quercetin from Polygonum cuspidatum targets COL3A1 to enhance CD8⁺ T cell cytotoxicity in gastric cancer.

Mutation research·2026
Same journal

E2F1 promotes LIHC malignant phenotype via NEK2-mediated Wnt/β-catenin and Notch activation and EMT.

Mutation research·2026
See all related articles

This review covers DNA mutation detection methods for screening unknown mutations and diagnosing known ones, emphasizing human genetic diseases. Various techniques are available, with choices depending on laboratory resources and specific applications.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Mutation detection is crucial across biological disciplines, often requiring extensive DNA sequencing.
  • The need for efficient screening and diagnosis of mutations, particularly in human genetic diseases, has driven method development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current methods for detecting unknown DNA mutations.
  • To discuss diagnostic methods for identifying previously defined mutations.
  • To highlight applications in human genetic diseases and other biological areas requiring comparative sequencing.

Main Methods:

  • Covers screening methods like ribonuclease, denaturing gradient-gel electrophoresis, chemical cleavage, single-strand conformation polymorphism, and heteroduplex analysis.
  • Includes diagnostic methods such as allele-specific oligonucleotide hybridization, amplification, ligation, primer extension, and restriction site introduction.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A range of effective methods exists for both mutation screening and diagnosis.
  • Method selection depends on laboratory expertise and specific application needs.
  • Screening technologies are continuously improving, and diagnostic methods are becoming automatable for cost-effective population screening.

Conclusions:

  • Diverse and advanced methods are available for mutation detection, catering to various research and diagnostic needs.
  • The choice of method should be tailored to the specific context, balancing efficiency and resources.
  • Future developments aim for more automated and cost-effective population-scale mutation screening.