Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modality specificity of evoked potential augmenting/reducing

J L Blenner1, C D Yingling

  • 1College of Health and Human Services, San Diego State University, CA 92182-0254.

Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
|March 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

To the editor.

Journal of clinical monitoring and computing·2015
Same author

The use of motor-evoked potentials to monitor sciatic nerve status during revision total hip arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2003
Same author

Reversed latissimus dorsi muscle flap for repair of recurrent congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Journal of pediatric surgery·2003
Same author

Facial nerve monitoring in middle ear and mastoid surgery.

The Laryngoscope·2001
Same author

Neural mechanisms of unconscious cognitive processing.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2001
Same author

Assessment of sensory function in neonatal sheep with somatosensory evoked potentials: methodology and normative data.

Pediatric surgery international·2000
Same journal

Coming to terms with brain waves.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2014
Same journal

Habituation of lower leg stretch responses in Parkinson's disease.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
Same journal

Asymmetry of cortical excitability revealed by transcranial stimulation in a patient with focal motor epilepsy and cortical myoclonus.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
Same journal

Evoked isometric muscle contractions in myopathies: analysis of pathophysiological properties by different stimulus patterns.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
Same journal

Task-related coherence and task-related spectral power changes during sequential finger movements.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
Same journal

Electrophysiological studies in mild idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
See all related articles

This study on sensory processing found that while both visual and auditory evoked potentials (EPs) increase with stimulus intensity, the N1-P2 component shows a stronger response to auditory stimuli. This suggests prefrontal cortex regulation, not a general sensory mechanism, influences perception.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Perception
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Background:

  • Augmenting/reducing phenomena involve changes in sensory perception based on stimulus intensity.
  • Previous theories suggested non-specific mechanisms like the reticular formation mediate these changes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural mechanisms underlying augmenting/reducing in visual and auditory evoked potentials (EPs).
  • To compare the stimulus-response functions of visual and auditory EPs across different electrode sites and components.

Main Methods:

  • Recorded visual and auditory evoked potentials (EPs) at varying stimulus intensities from Fz, Cz, and Oz (visual) and Fz, Cz (auditory).
  • Analyzed amplitudes of P1-N1 and N1-P2 components.
  • Compared the slopes of stimulus/response functions between modalities.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Visual evoked potential (EP) amplitudes at Oz did not increase with stimulus intensity.
  • Both visual and auditory EPs showed amplitude increases with intensity at Fz and Cz.
  • The N1-P2 component's response slope was significantly steeper for auditory than for visual EPs.

Conclusions:

  • Findings challenge the non-specific sensory modulation theory (e.g., reticular formation).
  • Results support a selective mechanism, potentially involving prefrontal cortex regulation of sensory transmission, for augmenting/reducing.
  • Differential N1-P2 component slopes suggest modality-specific processing differences in sensory regulation.