Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization

J C Mosher1, M E Spencer, R M Leahy

  • 1Signal and Image Processing Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90089-2564.

Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
|May 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neuroanatomic Markers of Posttraumatic Epilepsy Based on MR Imaging and Machine Learning.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2022
Same author

First Report of Aristastoma Leaf Spot on Desert Rose.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

First Report of Dieback Caused by Verticillium dahliae on Blighia sapida in the United States.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

Gladiolus Rust Caused by Uromyces transversalis Makes First Nearctic Appearance in Florida.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

Tomato spotted wilt virus Found in Five Species of the genus Tragopogon in a Florida Greenhouse.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

Automated MRI Volumetric Analysis in Patients with Rasmussen Syndrome.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2016
Same journal

Coming to terms with brain waves.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2014
Same journal

Habituation of lower leg stretch responses in Parkinson's disease.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
Same journal

Asymmetry of cortical excitability revealed by transcranial stimulation in a patient with focal motor epilepsy and cortical myoclonus.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
Same journal

Evoked isometric muscle contractions in myopathies: analysis of pathophysiological properties by different stimulus patterns.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
Same journal

Task-related coherence and task-related spectral power changes during sequential finger movements.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
Same journal

Electrophysiological studies in mild idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000
See all related articles

This study provides general formulas for calculating electroencephalographic (EEG) and magnetoencephalographic (MEG) dipole localization error bounds. Combining EEG and MEG data improves accuracy, but even under ideal conditions, millimeter accuracy is limited for single dipole models.

Area of Science:

  • Biophysics
  • Neuroscience
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Accurate source localization is crucial for understanding brain activity using EEG and MEG.
  • Current dipole models are widely used but have limitations in error estimation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To derive general formulas for lower bounds on localization and moment error for EEG/MEG dipole models.
  • To evaluate these bounds for various sensor configurations and head models.
  • To investigate the impact of combining EEG and MEG data on localization accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Development of general formulas for arbitrary sensor geometry.
  • Application of specific formulas to a 4-shell spherical head model.
  • Analysis of 1- and 2-dipole cases with varying locations and orientations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Monte Carlo simulations to validate derived bounds.

    • Main Results:

    • Localization error bounds are highly dependent on dipole location and orientation.
    • Fusion of EEG and MEG data demonstrably reduces localization error bounds.
    • Under optimistic conditions, EEG and MEG show comparable resolutions, but accuracy is limited to millimeters for single dipoles.
    • Error bounds increase significantly with two dipoles.

    Conclusions:

    • Fundamental resolution limits exist for EEG/MEG source localization.
    • Spatiotemporal modeling is necessary to improve localization accuracy.
    • The derived formulas and bounds are scalable for different noise and dipole intensity levels.