Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Phylogenetic inference: linear invariants and maximum likelihood

W C Navidi1, G A Churchill, A von Haeseler

  • 1Department of Mathematics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90089-1113.

Biometrics
|June 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Systems genetics uncover new loci containing functional gene candidates in <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>-infected Diversity Outbred mice.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

Genetic background influences susceptibility to chemotherapy-induced hematotoxicity.

The pharmacogenomics journal·2017
Same author

The phylogenetic likelihood library.

Systematic biology·2014
Same author

Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with acylsugar accumulation using intraspecific populations of the wild tomato, Lycopersicon pennellii.

TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik·2014
Same author

High-precision genetic mapping of behavioral traits in the diversity outbred mouse population.

Genes, brain, and behavior·2013
Same author

Discovery of blood transcriptomic markers for depression in animal models and pilot validation in subjects with early-onset major depression.

Translational psychiatry·2012
Same journal

Statistical analysis of disease onset during lifespan with left truncation.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Interim analysis in sequential multiple assignment randomized trials for survival outcomes.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Acknowledgment of Referees 2025.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

We introduce a novel statistical method for phylogenetic inference using a likelihood ratio test, offering a powerful alternative to linear invariants. This new approach simplifies evolutionary process assumptions for more accurate evolutionary tree construction.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Biostatistics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Phylogenetic inference is crucial for understanding evolutionary relationships.
  • Existing methods like linear invariants have limitations regarding parameter constraints and evolutionary process assumptions.
  • A robust statistical framework for phylogenetic tree reconstruction is needed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a new statistical method for phylogenetic inference based on the likelihood ratio test.
  • To mathematically establish the foundation for the method of linear invariants.
  • To compare the performance and requirements of the new likelihood ratio test method with the method of linear invariants.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a novel statistical method utilizing a likelihood ratio test for phylogenetic tree inference.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Mathematical formalization of the method of linear invariants, building upon prior work.
  • Comparative analysis of the two methods concerning parameter constraints and assumptions about evolutionary processes across sites.

    • Main Results:

    • The new likelihood ratio test method does not require parameter constraints but assumes identical evolutionary processes across sites.
    • The method of linear invariants requires parameter constraints but not identical evolutionary processes.
    • The method of linear invariants was shown to be asymptotically equivalent to a less powerful version of the likelihood ratio test, functioning as a maximum likelihood technique.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed likelihood ratio test provides a statistically sound and potentially more powerful method for phylogenetic inference.
    • Understanding the distinct assumptions and constraints of different phylogenetic methods is essential for accurate evolutionary analyses.
    • The study clarifies the mathematical basis and limitations of linear invariants in the context of modern phylogenetic inference techniques.