Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
Published on: October 24, 2012
Identification of the hemisphere activated by hemifield visual stimulation using a single equivalent dipole model
M Brigell1, G Rubboli, G G Celesia
1Department of Neurology, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL 60153.
A single equivalent dipole model accurately identified the stimulated hemisphere in 25/28 visual evoked potential tests, overcoming variability in surface topography. This method offers valuable insights into potential sources in the brain.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Ophthalmology
- Biophysics
Background:
- Pattern visual evoked potential (PVEP) amplitude distribution exhibits significant intersubject variability.
- Hemifield stimulation can lead to paradoxical P100 amplitudes, with larger responses ipsilateral to the stimulated field in some individuals.
- Surface topographic maps of PVEPs are unreliable for determining the stimulated hemifield or activated hemisphere.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of a single equivalent dipole model in identifying the stimulated hemifield despite variable surface amplitude distributions.
- To determine if dipole modeling can accurately identify the activated hemisphere in hemifield PVEP recordings.
- To investigate the relationship between equivalent dipole orientation and surface amplitude topography.
Main Methods:
- Recording hemifield pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEPs) from 14 normal subjects.
- Analyzing the topographic amplitude distribution of the P100 peak.
- Applying a single equivalent dipole model to PVEP data.
- Correlating dipole orientation with surface amplitude topography.
Main Results:
- Visual inspection of PVEP surface amplitude distribution failed to reliably identify the stimulated hemifield in most subjects (15/28).
- The single equivalent dipole model correctly identified the stimulated hemisphere in 25 out of 28 hemifield PVEPs.
- Dipole orientation, particularly tangential orientations, correlated with ipsilaterally predominant P100 surface topography.
- Dipole locations were sometimes anterior or inferior to the occipital lobe, indicating potential limitations.
Conclusions:
- A single equivalent dipole model provides a more reliable method for identifying the stimulated hemisphere compared to surface topography analysis.
- Dipole modeling offers valuable insights into the source localization of surface-recorded visual evoked potentials.
- Understanding dipole orientation is crucial for interpreting variable PVEP surface topography.
More Related Videos
05:36Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention
Published on: November 16, 2017
07:03Evaluation of Hemisphere Lateralization with Bilateral Local Field Potential Recording in Secondary Motor Cortex of Mice
Published on: July 31, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Induced Electric Dipoles
Since the absolute value of potential energy holds no physical meaning, its zero value can be chosen as per...
Calculations of Electric Potential II
Consider a...
Cerebral Hemispheres