Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Effects of combining maskers in modulation detection interference

S P Bacon1, B C Moore, M J Shailer

  • 1Department of Speech and Hearing Science, Arizona State University, Tempe 85287-1908.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|March 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Characterization of transient noise in Advanced LIGO relevant to gravitational wave signal GW150914.

Classical and quantum gravity·2020
Same author

GW150914: First results from the search for binary black hole coalescence with Advanced LIGO.

Physical review. D. (2016)·2020
Same author

Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA.

Living reviews in relativity·2018
Same author

Bioavailability and uptake of smelter emissions in freshwater zooplankton in northeastern Washington, USA lakes using Pb isotope analysis and trace metal concentrations.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2018
Same author

First Search for Nontensorial Gravitational Waves from Known Pulsars.

Physical review letters·2018
Same author

GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2.

Physical review letters·2017
Same journal

Interaction of near-wall bubble arrays with acoustic waves induced by an oscillating rigid wall.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Ultra-broadband underwater acoustic projector based on transverse resonance orthogonal beam (TROB) mode and acoustic matching layer technique.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Fine-scale quantitative analysis of bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus) song shows varying stability of song types.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

This study investigated auditory modulation detection interference. Combining two amplitude-modulated maskers did not significantly increase interference, suggesting limited additivity of modulation detection disruption.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal processing

Background:

  • Auditory masking occurs when a masker signal interferes with the detection of a target signal.
  • Amplitude modulation (AM) plays a crucial role in auditory object recognition and speech intelligibility.
  • Understanding AM detection interference is vital for fields like hearing aid design and audio compression.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the interference in detecting 10-Hz amplitude modulation (AM) of a 2000-Hz carrier.
  • To examine the effects of unmodulated and amplitude-modulated maskers on AM detection thresholds.
  • To investigate the additivity of interference from multiple amplitude-modulated maskers.

Main Methods:

  • Measured detection thresholds for 10-Hz AM on a 2000-Hz carrier.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed single and dual sinusoidal carriers (800-3200 Hz) as maskers.
  • Varied masker modulation rates from 2 to 80 Hz across two experiments.

    • Main Results:

    • Modulation tuning was largely unaffected by masker carrier frequency or the number of carriers.
    • Two-carrier conditions sometimes showed greater interference, primarily due to carrier presence, not modulation.
    • Combining two modulated maskers did not yield significantly more interference than the stronger single masker.

    Conclusions:

    • Limited evidence supports the additivity of interference in modulation detection.
    • The presence of carriers, rather than their modulation, is a significant factor in dual-carrier masking.
    • Findings suggest complex interactions rather than simple summation of masking effects.