Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Binocular rivalry is not chaotic

S R Lehky1

  • 1Division of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030.

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|January 23, 1995
PubMed
Summary

This study investigated binocular rivalry dominance durations. Chaos is not a major factor influencing the variability of these durations, suggesting stochastic processes are more likely.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fine discrimination of faces can be performed rapidly.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2000
Same author

Deficits in visual feature binding under isoluminant conditions.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2000
Same author

Seeing white: Qualia in the context of decoding population codes.

Neural computation·1999
Same author

No binocular rivalry in the LGN of alert macaque monkeys.

Vision research·1996
Same author

Predicting responses of nonlinear neurons in monkey striate cortex to complex patterns.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·1992
Same author

Neural model of stereoacuity and depth interpolation based on a distributed representation of stereo disparity.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·1990

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychophysics
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Binocular rivalry is a phenomenon where perception alternates between two different images presented to each eye.
  • The temporal dynamics of dominance durations in binocular rivalry are complex and not fully understood.
  • Previous research has explored various models, including deterministic chaos, to explain the variability in these durations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the time series of eye dominance durations during binocular rivalry.
  • To determine if the variability in dominance durations is better explained by a deterministic chaotic process or a stochastic process.

Main Methods:

  • Psychophysical measurement of dominance durations in binocular rivalry.
  • Correction for adaptation effects and non-stationarity in the time series data.
  • Application of correlation dimension calculations and nonlinear forecasting.
  • Comparison of results with randomized surrogate data to control for analysis artifacts.

Main Results:

  • Dominance durations exhibited an adaptation effect, with mean and standard deviations increasing as a square root function of time.
  • The probability distribution of dominance durations was log-normal, with no short-term correlations found.
  • Both chaos tests (correlation dimensions and nonlinear forecasting) showed no significant difference between actual and surrogate data.

Conclusions:

  • The findings suggest that deterministic chaos is not a primary driver of variability in binocular rivalry dominance durations.
  • The results support the interpretation of dominance duration variability as arising from stochastic processes.
  • Further research may focus on refining stochastic models to better capture binocular rivalry dynamics.

Related Experiment Videos