Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Systematic reviews--theory and practice

A Ohlsson1

  • 1Department of Newborn and Developmental Paediatrics, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation. Supplementum
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Urinary stress incontinence and other maternal outcomes 2 years after caesarean or vaginal birth for twin pregnancy: a multicentre randomised trial.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2018
Same author

Maternal outcomes at 3 months after planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for twin pregnancies in the Twin Birth Study: a randomised controlled trial.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2015
Same author

Outcomes of preterm infants <29 weeks gestation over 10-year period in Canada: a cause for concern?

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2011
Same author

The Early External Cephalic Version (ECV) 2 Trial: an international multicentre randomised controlled trial of timing of ECV for breech pregnancies.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2011
Same author

Moderate to severe hemolytic disease of the newborn in a referral centre in Saudi Arabia.

Annals of Saudi medicine·2010
Same author

How accurate are leukocyte indices and C-reactive protein for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis?

Paediatrics & child health·2010
Same journal

Standardization of tumor markers - priorities identified through external quality assessment.

Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum·2016
Same journal

Next generation sequencing in cancer: opportunities and challenges for precision cancer medicine.

Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum·2016
Same journal

microRNAs as cancer biomarkers.

Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum·2016
Same journal

Biomarkers along the continuum of care in lung cancer.

Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum·2016
Same journal

Precision medicine: what's all the fuss about?

Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum·2016
Same journal

Serum thyroglobulin in the monitoring of differentiated thyroid cancer.

Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum·2016
See all related articles

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses synthesize research evidence to guide healthcare decisions. These methods provide reliable, less biased information on treatment efficacy and effectiveness for clinicians and consumers.

Area of Science:

  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Health services research

Background:

  • Healthcare consumers expect medical practice to be based on scientific evidence.
  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are crucial for comparing healthcare interventions.
  • Systematic reviews are needed to synthesize available evidence for clinical questions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
  • To highlight their importance in evidence-based healthcare.
  • To explain their role in providing reliable clinical practice guidance.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic reviews apply scientific strategies to limit bias in assembling, appraising, and synthesizing studies.
  • Meta-analysis uses statistical methods to combine and summarize results from multiple trials.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Studies in meta-analysis are weighted by variance, giving more weight to studies with more events.

    • Main Results:

    • Systematic reviews offer less biased information than traditional expert overviews.
    • Meta-analysis increases statistical power for a more precise effect size estimate.
    • New statistical methods exist for summarizing data from diagnostic test studies.

    Conclusions:

    • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential tools for evidence-based healthcare.
    • Cumulative meta-analyses provide timely answers on intervention effectiveness.
    • These methods enhance reliability and reduce bias in clinical decision-making.