Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Normalisation: what it means in practice

O Barr

    British Journal of Nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)
    |January 8, 1995
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Normalization has driven learning disability services, but the term needs clearer definition. This article examines existing definitions and proposes key components for effective normalization in service delivery.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Police attitudes toward people with intellectual disability: an evaluation of awareness training.

    Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2001
    Same author

    Research utilization and attitudes towards research among learning disability nurses in Northern Ireland.

    Journal of advanced nursing·2000
    Same author

    Health screening for people with learning disabilities by a community learning disability nursing service in Northern Ireland.

    Journal of advanced nursing·1999
    Same author

    Care of people with learning disabilities in hospital.

    Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·1998
    Same author

    Interdisciplinary teamwork: consideration of the challenges.

    British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)·1997
    Same author

    The value of nursing models.

    Professional nurse (London, England)·1997

    Area of Science:

    • Disability Studies
    • Social Inclusion
    • Healthcare Policy

    Background:

    • Normalization principles have significantly influenced the development of services for individuals with learning disabilities.
    • The concept of normalization, while influential, currently lacks a universally accepted and precise definition within the field.
    • This ambiguity poses challenges for consistent and effective implementation in practice.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically explore and synthesize the various definitions of normalization as applied to learning disabilities.
    • To identify and delineate core components essential for integrating normalization into service provision frameworks.
    • To provide a foundation for more consistent and effective application of normalization in supporting individuals with learning disabilities.

    Main Methods:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Systematic literature review of academic and professional publications on normalization and learning disabilities.
    • Conceptual analysis of existing definitions and theoretical frameworks.
    • Synthesis of key themes and components relevant to service delivery.

    Main Results:

    • Identified a range of definitions for normalization, highlighting conceptual variations and overlaps.
    • Outlined several key components crucial for successful normalization, including social role valorization, community integration, and self-determination.
    • Emphasized the need for a clear, operationalizable definition to guide practice.

    Conclusions:

    • A clear definition and understanding of normalization are crucial for advancing services for individuals with learning disabilities.
    • Integrating key components like social role valorization and community integration can enhance the effectiveness of normalization strategies.
    • Further research and consensus-building are needed to refine the application of normalization in practice.