Related Experiment Videos
Towards authentic conversations. Authenticity in the patient-professional relationship
1Department of Philosophy, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Summary
This study explores authenticity in medical ethics, finding traditional views hinder patient-professional dialogue. An alternative, dialogue-based authenticity is proposed to improve shared decision-making and reduce alienation.
Area of Science:
- Medical Ethics
- Existential Philosophy
Background:
- The concept of authenticity, rooted in existentialism, has implications for medical ethics.
- Understanding authenticity is crucial for navigating the patient-professional relationship and ethical decision-making in healthcare.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the significance of existential authenticity in medical ethics.
- To analyze the impact of authenticity on patient-professional interactions and medical ethical decision-making.
- To propose an alternative conception of authenticity to address limitations in current medical ethical discourse.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the existential notion of authenticity.
- Examination of its implications for patient-professional relationships.
- Development of an alternative, dialogue-centered concept of authenticity.
Main Results:
- The traditional view of authenticity emphasizes individual responsibility but can be counterproductive to authentic patient-professional interaction and ethical deliberation.
- An alternative view defines authenticity as participation in a dialogue respecting mutual subjectivity.
- This dialogue-based approach fosters trust, mutual responsibility, and enhances shared decision-making.
Conclusions:
- Rethinking authenticity beyond individual sovereignty is essential for advancing medical ethics.
- An alternative, dialogical authenticity can overcome patient-professional alienation.
- This revised understanding promotes more effective and ethical healthcare interactions.