Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modeling interference in genetic recombination

M S McPeek1, T P Speed

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley 94720, USA.

Genetics
|February 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genomic characterisation of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer arising in very young women.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2023
Same author

Distribution of genomic breakpoints in chronic myeloid leukemia: analysis of 308 patients.

Leukemia·2013
Same author

Determining epithelial contribution to in vivo mesenchymal tumour expression signature using species-specific microarray profiling analysis of xenografts.

Genetics research·2013
Same author

A DNA resequencing array for genes involved in Parkinson's disease.

Parkinsonism & related disorders·2012
Same author

Replication of KIAA0350, IL2RA, RPL5 and CD58 as multiple sclerosis susceptibility genes in Australians.

Genes and immunity·2008
Same author

FIRMA: a method for detection of alternative splicing from exon array data.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2008
Same journal

Adaptive Dynamics of Quantitative Traits in a Steadily Changing Environment.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Functional Landscape of Zebrafish Gonadotropins and Receptors: A Comprehensive Genetic Analysis.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Synergistic actions of Nup43 and Myosin VI drive actin cone assembly during Drosophila spermiogenesis.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Identification of two Cryptococcus neoformans heme transporters involved in Fhb1-mediated nitrosative stress protection in a fission yeast model.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Analysis of a hypomorphic mei-P26 mutation reveals coordination between developmental programming of germ cells and meiotic chromosome dynamics.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Neural and Genetic Mechanisms Regulating Copulation Latency in Male Drosophila melanogaster.

Genetics·2026
See all related articles

Genetic linkage analysis often assumes a Poisson process for crossovers, but this is inaccurate. New models incorporating crossover interference significantly improve data fit, offering a more realistic approach to recombination.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Computational Biology
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Traditional genetic linkage analysis commonly assumes crossovers follow a Poisson process.
  • This assumption is known to be inaccurate, as crossover events often exhibit interference.
  • Crossover interference is the phenomenon where one crossover inhibits nearby crossovers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore and evaluate point process models for genetic recombination that incorporate position interference.
  • To assess the fit of these novel models to empirical genetic linkage data.
  • To determine if biologically inspired models offer improvements over the standard no-interference Poisson model.

Main Methods:

  • Discussed several point process models for recombination, focusing on position interference.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed stochastic simulation to fit these models to a multilocus Drosophila dataset.
  • Utilized the method of maximum likelihood for model parameter estimation and comparison.

    • Main Results:

    • Biologically inspired point process models with one or two additional parameters showed a significantly better fit to the Drosophila data.
    • The proposed models provide a more accurate representation of recombination patterns compared to the standard Poisson model.
    • Demonstrated the utility of stochastic simulation and maximum likelihood for fitting complex recombination models.

    Conclusions:

    • The assumption of no crossover interference (Poisson process) is inadequate for genetic linkage analysis.
    • Point process models incorporating position interference offer a more biologically realistic and statistically robust framework for analyzing recombination.
    • These advanced models can significantly improve the accuracy of genetic mapping and understanding of chromosome mechanics.