Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The regression hypothesis: communicative continuum vs. parametrically defined grammars

M L Schnitzer1

  • 1Universidad de Puerto Rico, San Juan 00931-3356, USA.

Brain and Language
|February 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

This study compares two models of aphasia regression, finding Schnitzer's approach more promising for explaining language deficits in aphasia. It offers a potentially more explanatory framework for understanding language regression in neurological conditions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diagnostic accuracy of SSR-PET/CT compared to histopathology in the identification of liver metastases from well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors.

Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society·2023
Same author

The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for assessing hepatocellular carcinoma compared to histopathology; a retrospective single-center analysis of 119 patients1.

Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation·2020
Same author

The development of segmental phonological production in a bilingual child.

Journal of child language·1994
Same author

Steady as a rock: does the steady state represent cognitive fossilization?

Journal of psycholinguistic research·1993
Same author

Pragmatic-mode mediation of sentence comprehension among aphasic bilinguals and hispanophones.

Brain and language·1989
Same author

Toward a neurolinguistic theory of language.

Brain and language·1978

Area of Science:

  • Linguistics
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Background:

  • The regression hypothesis in aphasia attempts to explain language deficits observed in individuals with aphasia.
  • Existing models, such as Grodzinsky's syndrome-based approach, face observational limitations in explaining aphasic phenomena.
  • The Theory of Principles and Parameters provides a framework for understanding the neurophysiological basis of language.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare and contrast the regression hypothesis proposals by Grodzinsky (1990) and Schnitzer (1989, 1990).
  • To evaluate the observational adequacy of Grodzinsky's syndrome-based model in aphasiology.
  • To assess the explanatory potential of Schnitzer's microgenetic interpretation of aphasic regression.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of theoretical models concerning aphasia regression.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Critique of Grodzinsky's syndrome-based model for its observational limitations.
  • Examination of Schnitzer's approach, which rejects mental grammars and utilizes a microgenetic continuum.

    • Main Results:

    • Grodzinsky's model is deemed observationally inadequate, failing to support a neurophysiologically realized central language system.
    • Schnitzer's approach offers a potential alternative by interpreting aphasic regression along Givón's continuum.
    • The study suggests Schnitzer's model has greater potential for genuine explanatory power in aphasiology.

    Conclusions:

    • Syndrome-based models like Grodzinsky's may not fully capture the complexities of aphasia.
    • Schnitzer's microgenetic approach, diverging from traditional mental grammars, shows promise for a more comprehensive understanding of language regression in aphasia.
    • Further development of Schnitzer's model could lead to significant advancements in aphasiological theory and practice.