Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Differences in mechanical efficiency between power- and endurance-trained athletes while jumping

H Kyröläinen1, P V Komi

  • 1Department of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.

European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Importance of strength training for sustaining performance and health in military personnel.

BMJ military health·2024
Same author

Physical activity, physical fitness and cardiometabolic health among Finnish military workers.

BMJ military health·2024
Same author

Changes in physical performance, body composition and physical training during military operations: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

Aerobic fitness predicted by demographics, anthropometrics, health behaviour, physical activity and muscle fitness in male and female recruits entering military service.

BMJ military health·2022
Same author

Physical fitness and anthropometrics in Finnish soldiers during their early career: prospective changes during a 3-year follow-up.

BMJ military health·2020
Same author

Changes in physical fitness and anthropometrics differ between female and male recruits during the Finnish military service.

BMJ military health·2020

Power-trained athletes exhibit higher power output during jumping exercises compared to endurance-trained athletes, though mechanical efficiency (ME) is similar across groups. Power athletes show faster muscle activation and smoother muscle patterns.

Area of Science:

  • Sports Science
  • Biomechanics
  • Exercise Physiology

Background:

  • Mechanical efficiency (ME) is crucial for athletic performance.
  • Understanding differences in ME between power and endurance athletes can inform training strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the mechanical efficiency (ME) of jumping exercises between power-trained and endurance-trained athletes.
  • To investigate biomechanical and physiological differences influencing ME in these athlete groups.

Main Methods:

  • Subjects performed drop jumps and sledge jumps at varying heights (optimum minus 40 cm, optimum, optimum plus 40 cm).
  • Mechanical efficiency was assessed using biomechanical and physiological approaches.
  • Electromyogram (EMG) activity was analyzed to understand muscle activation patterns.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • ME increased with higher stretch loads in both groups.
  • No significant differences in ME were found between power and endurance athletes, except in one specific drop jump condition (P < 0.05).
  • Power athletes demonstrated significantly higher power output (P < 0.001) with faster EMG development and smoother muscle activity.

Conclusions:

  • While overall mechanical efficiency is comparable, power athletes possess superior power output due to enhanced muscle activation dynamics.
  • Training specialization influences neuromuscular control and power generation during jumping exercises.