Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Test-retest variability and correlations between tests of texture processing, motion processing, visual acuity, and

T L Simpson1, D Regan

  • 1Centre for Contact Lens Research, School of Optometry, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

Optometry and Vision Science : Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optimization of ovine bone decalcification for increased cellular detail: a parametric study.

Journal of histotechnology·2021
Same author

Immune regulation of canine tumour and macrophage PD-L1 expression.

Veterinary and comparative oncology·2016
Same author

Oral and anal sex are key to sustaining gonorrhoea at endemic levels in MSM populations: a mathematical model.

Sexually transmitted infections·2015
Same author

Association of participation in a mindfulness programme with bowel symptoms, gastrointestinal symptom-specific anxiety and quality of life.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2011
Same author

Head and neck cancer in Australia between 1982 and 2005 show increasing incidence of potentially HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancers.

British journal of cancer·2011
Same author

Case report: Chalazion and its features visualized by ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography.

Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association·2010

New clinical tests for motion and texture processing demonstrate reliable and consistent results, comparable to established methods for assessing visual acuity and contrast sensitivity.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Visual Neuroscience
  • Clinical Psychophysics

Background:

  • Conventional clinical tests assess visual acuity and contrast sensitivity using luminance-defined letters.
  • Understanding texture and motion processing offers complementary insights into visual function.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the test-retest reliability of novel clinical tests for texture and motion processing.
  • To compare these new tests with established measures of high- and low-contrast visual acuity and Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty normally sighted subjects underwent repeated testing over two days.
  • Measurements included monocular visual acuity (high/low contrast), Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity, and recognition thresholds for motion- and texture-defined letters.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • High test-retest correlation coefficients (0.61-0.91) and regression slopes close to 1.0 were observed for all tested modalities.
  • Significant correlations were found between high- and low-contrast visual acuity, and between texture-defined letter recognition and both high- and low-contrast visual acuity.

Conclusions:

  • Test-retest variability for motion and texture processing tests is comparable to established clinical acuity and contrast sensitivity tests.
  • These novel tests provide reliable clinical information that complements conventional methods.