Related Experiment Videos

[10 years of therapy with implantable defibrillators--observation in 353 patients]

H J Trappe1, P Wenzlaff, H Klein

  • 1Abteilung Thorax-, Herz- und Gefässchirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover.

Zeitschrift Fur Kardiologie
|March 1, 1995
PubMed

Insights

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) show high efficacy in treating ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Non-thoracotomy ICD implantation has lower operative mortality compared to epicardial procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Devices

Context:

  • The study analyzes data from 353 patients who received implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) since 1984.
  • It compares outcomes between epicardial and non-thoracotomy ICD implantation procedures.
  • Patient follow-up averaged 25 months, assessing mortality and device performance.

Purpose:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs).
  • To compare operative mortality between epicardial and non-thoracotomy ICD implantation techniques.
  • To assess the incidence of sudden arrhythmic death, cardiac death, and other causes of mortality post-ICD implantation.

Summary:

  • Overall operative mortality was 3%, with significantly higher rates for epicardial (5%) versus non-thoracotomy (<1%) ICD implantation.
  • During follow-up, 19% of patients died, with sudden arrhythmic death and cardiac death being significant causes.
  • Appropriate ICD discharges occurred in 72% of patients, effectively managing ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTAs) through shocks and antitachycardia pacing.

Impact:

  • Non-thoracotomy ICD implantation is associated with lower operative mortality, suggesting a safer surgical approach.
  • ICDs demonstrate significant effectiveness in preventing sudden arrhythmic death and managing VTAs.
  • The findings support the continued use and refinement of ICD technology for managing life-threatening arrhythmias.

Related Concept Videos