Related Experiment Videos
Errors in calculating weight-for-height
1Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine.
Disasters
|March 1, 1995
Summary
Calculating weight-for-height can lead to errors, impacting nutrition intervention policies. This study highlights calculation discrepancies using different methods and measurements, urging careful data handling for accurate malnutrition assessments.
Area of Science:
- Nutrition Science
- Public Health
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Weight-for-height is a key indicator for recent malnutrition.
- It informs critical policy decisions regarding nutrition interventions.
- Accurate calculation is essential for effective public health strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and quantify potential errors in weight-for-height calculations.
- To compare results from different calculation tools and measurement methods.
- To provide recommendations for improving the accuracy of weight-for-height assessments.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of weight-for-height data using WHO international reference figures, Teaching-aids At Low Cost (TALC) cards, and Epi Info software (versions 5 and 6).
- Assessment of errors arising from misinterpreting supine measurements as stature and vice versa.
- Evaluation of discrepancies between standard deviation scores (SDS) and percentages of the median (POM).
Main Results:
- Significant variations in weight-for-height results were observed across different calculation methods and tools.
- Errors were introduced by incorrect treatment of supine versus stature measurements.
- Standard deviation scores (SDS) and percentages of the median (POM) yielded different outcomes, with POM being less reliable.
Conclusions:
- The international reference figures should be published in a more accessible tabular format.
- Plasticized cards and percentages of the median are not recommended for international comparative studies.
- Researchers using Epi Info must be aware of its specific weight-for-height calculation methods to ensure accurate data collection and analysis.