Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Errors in calculating weight-for-height

S B Macfarlane1

  • 1Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine.

Disasters
|March 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Calculating weight-for-height can lead to errors, impacting nutrition intervention policies. This study highlights calculation discrepancies using different methods and measurements, urging careful data handling for accurate malnutrition assessments.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Suicidality and associated risk factors in outpatients attending a general medical facility in rural Kenya.

Journal of affective disorders·2017
Same author

A computer assisted exercise in classifying nutritional status: a new tool for learning.

Disasters·2010
Same author

University partnership to address the shortage of healthcare professionals in Africa.

Global public health·2009
Same author

Global health research and INCLEN. International Clinical Epidemiology Network.

Lancet (London, England)·1999
Same author

Conducting a descriptive survey: 3. Summarizing and presenting data.

Tropical doctor·1998
Same author

More growth-chart confusion.

Lancet (London, England)·1997

Area of Science:

  • Nutrition Science
  • Public Health
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Weight-for-height is a key indicator for recent malnutrition.
  • It informs critical policy decisions regarding nutrition interventions.
  • Accurate calculation is essential for effective public health strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and quantify potential errors in weight-for-height calculations.
  • To compare results from different calculation tools and measurement methods.
  • To provide recommendations for improving the accuracy of weight-for-height assessments.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of weight-for-height data using WHO international reference figures, Teaching-aids At Low Cost (TALC) cards, and Epi Info software (versions 5 and 6).
  • Assessment of errors arising from misinterpreting supine measurements as stature and vice versa.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of discrepancies between standard deviation scores (SDS) and percentages of the median (POM).

    • Main Results:

    • Significant variations in weight-for-height results were observed across different calculation methods and tools.
    • Errors were introduced by incorrect treatment of supine versus stature measurements.
    • Standard deviation scores (SDS) and percentages of the median (POM) yielded different outcomes, with POM being less reliable.

    Conclusions:

    • The international reference figures should be published in a more accessible tabular format.
    • Plasticized cards and percentages of the median are not recommended for international comparative studies.
    • Researchers using Epi Info must be aware of its specific weight-for-height calculation methods to ensure accurate data collection and analysis.