Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to electrical stimulation in the cat. I. Absolute thresholds

Estimates of electrical auditory brainstem response (EABR) thresholds are compared with behavioral thresholds for electrical stimulation in the same subject using identical stimuli and electrode configurations. Four cats were behaviorally trained to measure acoustic auditory thresholds using food as a reward in an operant reinforcement paradigm. One of the animals was then implanted, in an otherwise normal ear, with a scaled-UCSF multi-contact electrode array containing four intracochlear electrodes. Three animals were implanted with an electrode array containing eight intracochlear contacts and one extracochlear contact under the temporalis muscle following unilateral cochlear perfusion with 10% neomycin solution. Stimuli for the behavioral studies were single presentations of 200 us/phase biphasic current pulses. For the EABR studies, the same stimulus was presented at a rate of 32/s. In general, for the animal with the four-contact array and two of the three subjects with the eight-contact implant, changes in electrode configuration produced well-differentiated changes in threshold. For these three subjects, comparisons of behavioral and EABR thresholds for the majority of monopolar and bipolar electrode configurations tested showed excellent agreement (r2 = 0.88). Correlations between behavioral and EABR measures in these animals were comparable for bipolar and monopolar arrangements (r2 = 0.88 for bipolar and 0.87 for monopolar). For one subject with the eight-contact electrode, who showed similar monopolar and bipolar electrode behavioral thresholds for all tested electrode spacings or configurations, most EABR thresholds were substantially higher than, and poorly correlated with, behavioral thresholds (r2 = 0.15; r2 = 0.28 for monopolar arrangements, and r2 = 0.12 for bipolar arrangements).