Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Prior knowledge and functionally relevant features in concept learning

E J Wisniewski1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208-2710, USA.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|March 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

When concepts combine.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2011
Same author

On the necessity of alignment: reply to Costello and Keane (2001).

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2001
Same author

Similarity, alignment, and conceptual combination: comment on Estes and Glucksberg.

Memory & cognition·2000
Same author

What makes a man similar to a tie? Stimulus compatibility with comparison and integration.

Cognitive psychology·2000
Same author

A structural account of global and local processing.

Cognitive psychology·1999
Same author

Property instantiation in conceptual combination.

Memory & cognition·1998

This study explores how prior knowledge and experience interact in empirical learning. Findings suggest these influences are tightly integrated, challenging simpler models of knowledge incorporation.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Machine Learning
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Empirical learning models often focus on statistical feature properties like cue and category validity.
  • These models typically do not account for the interplay between prior knowledge and direct experience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine extensions of empirical learning models that integrate prior knowledge with experience.
  • To compare the predictive accuracy of these extended models across different scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted to test model predictions.
  • Studies contrasted feature validity (cue and category) with prior knowledge of artifact functions.
  • Model predictions were evaluated based on how well they captured human judgments.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The integration of prior knowledge and experience in learning appears more complex than many models suggest.
  • Simple methods of incorporating knowledge, such as weighting features by general or individual relevance, were found to be insufficient.
  • Empirical findings indicate a tighter coupling between knowledge and experience than predicted by basic statistical learning models.

Conclusions:

  • More sophisticated approaches are needed to model the integration of prior knowledge and empirical learning.
  • Future models should consider factors like intermediary features, conceptual coherence, and functional roles.
  • The findings highlight the need for richer models of human concept learning that go beyond statistical feature analysis.