Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Physician-assisted death: progress or peril?

T E Quill1

  • 1Program for Biopsychosocial Studies, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, New York, USA.

Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Principle of double effect and end-of-life pain management: additional myths and a limited role.

Journal of palliative medicine·2005
Same author

Assisted suicide and cancer.

The Lancet. Oncology·2002
Same author

"I wish things were different": expressing wishes in response to loss, futility, and unrealistic hopes.

Annals of internal medicine·2001
Same author

Perspectives on care at the close of life. Initiating end-of-life discussions with seriously ill patients: addressing the "elephant in the room".

JAMA·2000
Same author

Palliative treatments of last resort: choosing the least harmful alternative. University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics Assisted Suicide Consensus Panel.

Annals of internal medicine·2000
Same author

Responding to intractable terminal suffering: the role of terminal sedation and voluntary refusal of food and fluids. ACP-ASIM End-of-Life Care Consensus Panel. American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine.

Annals of internal medicine·2000
Same journal

A Randomized Controlled Trial With an Internal Pilot of a Co-Designed App Targeting Upstream Suicide-Related Risk and Protective Factors Among International Students.

Suicide & life-threatening behavior·2026
Same journal

Predicting Next-Day Passive Suicidal Ideation in At-Risk Youth.

Suicide & life-threatening behavior·2026
Same journal

Emotional Responses to Social Media and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Among Adolescents.

Suicide & life-threatening behavior·2026
Same journal

Prevalence and Timing of Suicidal Ideation, Preparation, and Attempts Among Mass Shooting Survivors.

Suicide & life-threatening behavior·2026
Same journal

Suicidality of Indigenous Teenagers as an Anomic Adaptation to Frustration: An Empirical Test (Correlates of Indigenous Teenage Suicidality).

Suicide & life-threatening behavior·2026
Same journal

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Impact of the Couples Crisis Response Plan (CCRP) to Reduce Post-Discharge Suicide Risk: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Suicide & life-threatening behavior·2026
See all related articles

Physician-assisted death presents ethical dilemmas, particularly for patients with unrelievable suffering. This challenges suicide prevention efforts by questioning the rationality of end-of-life choices when no other options exist.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Palliative Care
  • Suicidology

Background:

  • Physician-assisted death (PAD) is a complex issue intersecting suicide prevention and end-of-life care.
  • Existing ethical frameworks recognize the rationality of withdrawing life-sustaining treatment.
  • However, similar requests from patients without such treatment are often delegitimized.

Observation:

  • Modern palliative care, while advanced, cannot alleviate all suffering in terminally ill patients.
  • Some patients experience profound personal disintegration and humiliation despite best efforts.
  • The manuscript examines personal narratives of incurable suffering and limited options.

Findings:

  • The study highlights a gap in acknowledging the potential rationality of PAD requests for patients with intractable suffering.
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia

Related Experiment Videos

  • It contrasts the acceptance of withdrawing treatment with the rejection of assisted death for similar existential distress.
  • Physician responses to these complex cases remain a critical area of consideration.

    • Implications:

    • Re-evaluating ethical guidelines for PAD may be necessary to address unrelievable suffering.
    • This research could inform policy discussions on patient autonomy and end-of-life decision-making.
    • Understanding patient perspectives is crucial for compassionate care in terminal illness.