Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Portable oxygen therapy with oxygen conserving devices and methodologies

B Tiep1

  • 1Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programme, Casa Colina Hospital, Pomona, CA 91767, USA.

Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease = Archivio Monaldi Per Le Malattie Del Torace
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Portable oxygen systems improve mobility for end-stage COPD patients. Oxygen conserving devices offer significant savings and reduce patient burden compared to standard continuous flow oxygen therapy.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Oxygen conserving devices and methodologies.

Chronic respiratory disease·2008
Same author

Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Current opinion in pulmonary medicine·1998
Same author

Evaluation of the pendant oxygen-conserving nasal cannula during exercise.

Chest·1986
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Pulmonary Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients often require long-term oxygen therapy.
  • Standard continuous flow oxygen delivery is effective but inefficient and cumbersome for mobility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review portable oxygen therapy options for end-stage COPD.
  • To highlight oxygen conserving methodologies for improved patient mobility and efficiency.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing oxygen delivery systems.
  • Comparison of continuous flow versus oxygen conserving devices.
  • Analysis of device types: reservoir cannulas, transtracheal catheters, demand pulsing devices.

Main Results:

  • Oxygen conserving devices offer 2:1 to 7:1 savings over continuous flow.

Related Experiment Videos

  • These devices enhance portability, reduce costs, and improve patient activity levels.
  • A variety of methodologies allows for individualized patient care.

    • Conclusions:

    • Portable and conserving oxygen systems are essential for end-stage COPD management.
    • Clinicians can select optimal systems based on individual patient needs.
    • Advancements in oxygen delivery enhance quality of life for debilitated patients.