Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Single P100 visual evoked potential analyses in man

G Z Rosenstein1, V Furman, H Sohmer

  • 1Department of Physiology, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel.

The International Journal of Neuroscience
|December 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measurement of the <sup>235</sup>U fission cross section relative to the standard <sup>10</sup>B(n, α) reaction at the CERN n_TOF facility: Results for E<sub>n</sub>< 2 eV.

Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine·2025
Same author

Neutron capture measurements for s-process nucleosynthesis: A review about CERN n_TOF developments and contributions.

The European physical journal. A, Hadrons and nuclei·2025
Same author

Shedding Light on the Origin of ^{204}Pb, the Heaviest s-Process-Only Isotope in the Solar System.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Measurement of the ^{140}Ce(n,γ) Cross Section at n_TOF and Its Astrophysical Implications for the Chemical Evolution of the Universe.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

<math></math> Ge( <math></math> ) cross section below 70 keV measured at n_TOF CERN.

The European physical journal. A, Hadrons and nuclei·2022
Same author

Neutron Capture on the s-Process Branching Point ^{171}Tm via Time-of-Flight and Activation.

Physical review letters·2020
Same journal

Thoracic paravertebral nerve block combined with general anesthesia for patients undergoing minimally invasive vertebroplasty: effects on pain and lumbar function.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Recurrence associated IGFBP2 promotes malignant progression and epithelial mesenchymal transition in glioma cells via the AKT mTOR pathway.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Decreased miR-1305 expression is associated with tumour invasiveness and poor prognosis in glioma patients.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Astaxanthin alleviates ischemia-reperfusion injury by regulating the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Clinical efficacy of cryopreserved autologous bone flaps versus titanium plates for cranioplasty: A retrospective comparative study.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Sericin improves diabetic cognitive impairment in rats by inhibiting TXNIP/NLRP3 neuroinflammation through SIRT1.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Analyzing single visual evoked potentials (VEP) reveals inherent variability lost in standard averaging. This variability in VEP amplitude and latency may reflect crucial brain processing insights.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Ophthalmology
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Standard evoked potential averaging methods discard valuable information from single evoked potentials.
  • Moment-to-moment variability in amplitude and latency of single evoked potentials is often overlooked.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop methods for recording single visual evoked potentials (VEP).
  • To compare information extracted from single VEPs versus conventional averaging.
  • To investigate the relationship between VEP variability, latency jitter, and habituation.

Main Methods:

  • Developed procedures to record single VEPs in a subset of subjects.
  • Utilized reversal checkerboard patterns to elicit VEPs.
  • Compared arithmetic averaging of single VEPs with time-locked averaging of the same data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Created model single VEPs by combining pre-stimulus EEG with averaged VEPs.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified recognizable single VEPs in 43-86% of stimuli for 11/25 subjects.
    • Arithmetic averaging of single VEPs showed increasing amplitude, while time-locked averages decreased.
    • Amplitude reduction in time-locked averages correlated with latency jitter.
    • True single VEPs exhibited less variability and stronger latency-amplitude correlation than model VEPs.

    Conclusions:

    • Single visual evoked potentials possess inherent variability.
    • This variability may offer a more accurate reflection of brain processing than traditional averaging.
    • Findings suggest latency jitter and VEP variability are key to understanding habituation.