Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Radiology

R G Evens1

  • 1Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo, USA.

JAMA
|June 7, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Radiologists may interpret mammograms differently, impacting patient care. Digital imaging and electronic storage offer new possibilities for medical image analysis and accessibility.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Results of and comments on the 2000 survey of the American Association of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology.

Academic radiology·2001
Same author

Introduction to reimbursement issues: the importance of economics to the practice of radiology.

European radiology·2000
Same author

Reimbursement in the United States: a critical and complicated process.

European radiology·2000
Same author

Results of and comments on the 1998 survey of the American Association of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology.

Academic radiology·2000
Same author

Public policy: the case for lobbying in radiology.

Radiology·2000
Same author

Advances in the use of computed tomography.

JAMA·1999

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Interventional Radiology

Background:

  • Mammogram interpretation by radiologists exhibits significant variability.
  • Interventional radiology increasingly utilizes stents for vascular lesion treatment.
  • Digital radiography allows for electronic storage of all radiographic images.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the implications of variability in mammogram interpretation.
  • To discuss the role of digital imaging in modern radiology.
  • To highlight advancements in interventional radiology techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature on mammography interpretation.
  • Analysis of technological advancements in radiographic image digitization.
  • Case study examples in interventional radiology.

Main Results:

  • Inter-observer variability in mammogram readings is a recognized challenge.
  • Digital storage enhances image accessibility and management.
  • Stent-based interventions are becoming standard for certain vascular conditions.

Conclusions:

  • Addressing interpretation variability is crucial for consistent mammography outcomes.
  • Digital radiography facilitates improved workflow and data management in radiology.
  • Technological integration in radiology enhances diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities.

Related Experiment Videos