Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2026

04:58
Method of Studying Palatal Fusion using Static Organ Culture
Published on: September 19, 2015
Fetal cleft lip with and without cleft palate: US classification and correlation with outcome
D A Nyberg1, G K Sickler, F N Hegge
1Department of Ultrasound, Swedish Hospital Medical Center, Seattle, Wash, USA.
Radiology
|June 1, 1995
Summary
A new prenatal ultrasound classification for cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL-P) effectively predicts fetal outcomes and associated anomalies. This system aids in improved genetic counseling and clinical management strategies for CL-P cases.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Prenatal Diagnosis
- Genetics
Background:
- Cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL-P) is a common congenital anomaly.
- Accurate prenatal assessment is crucial for effective management and counseling.
- Existing classification systems may not fully capture the spectrum of CL-P and its implications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish a prenatal ultrasonographic (US) classification system for cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL-P).
- To correlate this novel US classification with fetal outcomes, including concurrent anomalies and chromosomal abnormalities.
- To evaluate the utility of the classification in guiding prenatal counseling and management.
Main Methods:
- A 5-year retrospective and prospective study of 65 fetuses with CL-P identified via prenatal US.
- Development of a five-category classification system based on cleft type: lip alone, unilateral CL-P, bilateral CL-P, midline CL-P, and associated facial defects.
- Analysis of sonographic findings, concurrent anomalies, chromosomal abnormalities, and overall fetal outcome for each category.
Main Results:
- The ultrasonographic classification demonstrated a strong correlation with the severity of the defect and fetal outcome.
- Type 4 (midline CL-P) and Type 5 (associated facial defects) clefts were linked to universal concurrent anomalies and adverse fetal outcomes.
- Chromosome abnormalities varied significantly across types, ranging from 0% in Type 1 to 52% in Type 4, indicating prognostic value.
Conclusions:
- Prenatal ultrasonographic classification of CL-P is a valuable tool for predicting fetal outcomes.
- The proposed classification system can significantly enhance prenatal counseling and clinical management strategies for affected families.
- This standardized approach aids in risk stratification and informed decision-making during pregnancy.

