Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spatial language and spatial representation

W G Hayward1, M J Tarr

  • 1Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8205, USA.

Cognition
|April 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Hypernephroma in a polycyctic kidney.

The Journal of urology·2010
Same author

Does visual subordinate-level categorisation engage the functionally defined fusiform face area?

Cognitive neuropsychology·2010
Same author

In vitro modulation of macrophage functions by 1,1-dimethylhydrazine (UDMH): Possible mechanism for UDMH-induced immuno-enhancement.

Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA·2010
Same author

Expertise training with novel objects leads to left-lateralized facelike electrophysiological responses.

Psychological science·2002
Same author

What defines a view?

Vision research·2001
Same journal

Evidence for abstract spatial concept learning in young animals.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Blurred lines or clear boundaries? Synchrony and social dominance shape domain-specific self-other processing.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Knowability predicts curiosity and learning.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Throwing good effort after bad: Evidence for a sunk-cost effect in cognitive effort-based decision-making.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Cross-linguistic differences in incremental planning under uncertainty.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Sensory attenuation scales with the strength of action-outcome coupling: A psychophysical study.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Language and visual perception of space share structural similarities. Spatial terms are most applicable and accurately perceived when objects are horizontally or vertically aligned, suggesting visual representation influences linguistic encoding of space.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Linguistics
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Spatial relations are fundamental to both language and visual perception.
  • Previous research suggested commonalities but lacked direct evidence on structural similarities.
  • Visual spatial relations are often defined by linguistic counterparts, necessitating independent investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate structural similarities between linguistic and visual representations of space.
  • To determine if common spatial terms correspond to distinct visual spatial structures.
  • To explore the influence of visual spatial organization on linguistic encoding of space.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1 & 2: Assessed linguistic encoding by having participants generate or rate spatial terms for object pairs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 3 & 4: Investigated visual representation through object position recall and sequential position judgment tasks.
  • Correlated linguistic applicability ratings with visual spatial accuracy and sensitivity.

    • Main Results:

    • Spatial terms were most frequently used and applicable for objects in vertical or horizontal alignment.
    • Visual spatial judgments (accuracy and sensitivity) were highest for object positions with high linguistic applicability.
    • A strong correspondence was found between linguistic and visual encoding of spatial relationships.

    Conclusions:

    • The structure of spatial language appears to be influenced by the underlying organization of visual spatial representation.
    • Linguistic and visual systems for representing space share common structural principles, particularly concerning alignment.
    • Findings support a unified view of spatial representation across different cognitive modalities.