Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

T-groups (training groups) in psychiatric residency programs: facts and possible implications

J S Gans1, J S Rutan, N Wilcox

  • 1Harvard Medical School, USA.

International Journal of Group Psychotherapy
|April 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Albumin and bleed risk in rivaroxaban treated patients.

Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis·2020
Same author

Taking a history of childhood trauma in psychotherapy : achieving an optimal approach.

The Journal of psychotherapy practice and research·2012
Same author

Growth through shame and humiliation.

International journal of group psychotherapy·2000
Same author

The detection of shame in group psychotherapy: uncovering the hidden emotion.

International journal of group psychotherapy·2000
Same author

Silence in group psychotherapy: a powerful communication.

International journal of group psychotherapy·2000
Same author

The missed session in psychodynamic group psychotherapy.

International journal of group psychotherapy·1999
Same journal

The Group Rupture Resolution Rating System (G-3RS): Therapeutic Alliance Ruptures and Repairs in Group Psychotherapy.

International journal of group psychotherapy·2026
Same journal

Blood from a Stone: A Rough Guide for Group Therapy Implementation in Community Mental Healthcare.

International journal of group psychotherapy·2026
Same journal

Disclosure and Empathy in a Group Teletherapy Setting.

International journal of group psychotherapy·2026
Same journal

The Use of Self-Disclosure in Group Therapy: Engaging Social Enactments in Modern Group Treatment.

International journal of group psychotherapy·2026
Same journal

Editorial: Thank You.

International journal of group psychotherapy·2026
Same journal

We Deserve Space: A Pilot Outcomes Study of a Group Psychotherapy Intervention for Internalized Weight Stigma.

International journal of group psychotherapy·2026
See all related articles

Psychiatric residency programs value T-groups, but negative attitudes and curriculum shifts impact their inclusion. The study recommends advocating for T-groups in psychiatric training.

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry
  • Medical Education
  • Group Therapy

Background:

  • T-groups (Training Groups) were studied in US psychiatric residency programs in 1992.
  • Psychodynamic psychotherapy teaching has seen a recent deemphasis, potentially affecting T-groups.
  • Group therapy is predicted to become a primary treatment modality due to economic constraints.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the status and perceived value of T-groups in psychiatric residency programs.
  • To identify reasons for the non-inclusion of T-groups in some programs.
  • To explore the challenges and benefits of T-groups in psychiatric training.

Main Methods:

  • A 32-item questionnaire was distributed to 297 psychiatric residency training directors.
  • A 34% response rate was achieved.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Results were analyzed to understand program offerings, attitudes, and challenges related to T-groups.
  • Main Results:

    • Programs offering T-groups demonstrate their value through dedicated time, leader quality, and alignment with program objectives.
    • 45% of non-offering programs cited negative attitudes towards T-groups as a reason for exclusion.
    • T-groups present unique educational and therapeutic features, creating contract tensions regarding confidentiality and attendance.

    Conclusions:

    • T-groups are valued where offered, but face challenges from negative perceptions and curriculum changes.
    • The inherent dual nature of T-groups (educational/therapeutic) requires careful management of their contracts.
    • Advocating for T-groups and their integration into psychiatric curricula is recommended for future training.