[Comparison between balanced anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia in videolaparocholecystectomy]

The aim of this work was to assess which anaesthetic technique is more suitable to the performance of videolaparocholecystectomy (VLC), particularly seeking for a faster and more comfortable recovery, although saving the maximum safety of the patient. A comparative investigation between two different anaesthetic techniques was carried out in 40 patients scheduled for VLC; the procedure's average length was 110.3 +/- 32.8 minutes and pneu- moperitoneum was obtained with 12-15 mmHg of CO2. Patients (32 females and 8 males, average age 52.3 +/- 8 years and ASA class 1, 2, 3, were randomized in two groups. The first group was administered total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA): propofol+ fentanyl+pancuronio bromide; the second one received balanced narcosis:TPS+ Isoflurane+Pancuronio bromide. The following parameters were monitored at set times: SAP, DAP, HR and EtCO2; statistical analysis was performed by analysis of variance. The quality of recovery was assessed by Steward's test and analyzed by Student's "t" test. The data obtained from analysis of the intraoperative parameters showed no significant differences between the two groups; on the contrary a statistically significant difference was found with regard to the quality of recovery (p > 0.5 at 5' from the extubation). Thus, the comparative study showed the efficacy and safety of both techniques, but TIVA allowed a faster and more comfortable awakening with shorter time to recovery of consciousness. This, together with the reduced requirements of analgesic drugs in the postoperative period and the lack of air pollution, seems to suggest that TIVA is to be preferred for laparoscopic surgery.