Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic assisted colectomies versus open colectomy

A K Saba1, G M Kerlakian, G C Kasper

  • 1Department of Surgery, Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery
|February 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy offers comparable resection adequacy to open colectomy. This minimally invasive approach provides significant patient benefits, including faster recovery and shorter hospital stays.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Anticoagulation: The rest of the story.

Current surgery·2005
Same author

Carotid thromboendarterectomy for recent total occlusion of the internal carotid artery.

Journal of vascular surgery·2001
Same author

Efficacy of routine preoperative computed tomography scans in colon cancer.

The American surgeon·1999
Same author

Evaluation of lidocaine as an analgesic when added to hypertonic saline for sclerotherapy.

Journal of vascular surgery·1999
Same author

Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: safe and cost effective?

Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy·1998
Same author

Endovascular stent infection with delayed bacterial challenge.

American journal of surgery·1997
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Oncology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Minimally invasive surgical techniques are increasingly adopted across various procedures.
  • Comparative efficacy studies are crucial for establishing new techniques as the standard of care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy and patient outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy versus traditional open colectomy.
  • To evaluate surgical resection adequacy, recovery parameters, and length of hospital stay.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective comparison of 25 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies and 25 open colectomies.
  • Procedures performed by the same surgeon within the last five years.
  • Analysis of resection length, lymph node yield, return of bowel function, and length of stay.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy demonstrated comparable resection length (15.7 cm vs. 19.3 cm) and lymph node retrieval (6 vs. 10).
  • Patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy experienced earlier return of bowel function (postoperative day 2 vs. day 5) and shorter hospital stays (4 days vs. 8 days).
  • While initial operating costs were higher, they were offset by reduced length of stay.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy is a technically safe and effective alternative to open colectomy.
  • The procedure offers substantial patient benefits, including reduced discomfort, faster recovery, and shorter hospitalization.
  • Minimally invasive colectomy shows promise for improved patient outcomes and resource utilization.