Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Standardizing performance-based criteria for support surfaces

T Krouskop, L van Rijswijk

    Ostomy/Wound Management
    |January 1, 1995
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Combining one-session treatment with a homework program including app-based technology to enhance the treatment of childhood specific phobias: A study protocol of a multicenter pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

    Contemporary clinical trials communications·2024
    Same author

    Elastographic image quality vs. tissue motion in vivo.

    Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2006
    Same author

    Ingredient-based wound dressing classification: a paradigm that is passé and in need of replacement.

    Journal of wound care·2006
    Same author

    A quantitative comparison of modulus images obtained using nanoindentation with strain elastograms.

    Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2004
    Same author

    Comparing elastographic strain images with modulus images obtained using nanoindentation: preliminary results using phantoms and tissue samples.

    Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2004
    Same author

    Documentation with MDS Section M: Skin Condition.

    Advances in skin & wound care·2002
    Same journal

    A Descriptive, Qualitative Study to Explore the Pain Experience During Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Postsurgical Abdominal Wounds.

    Ostomy/wound management·2018
    Same journal

    Cultivating Incontinence-associated Dermatitis Prevention Practices in an Australian Local Health District: A Quasi-experimental Study.

    Ostomy/wound management·2018
    Same journal

    Early and Late Closure of Loop Ileostomies: A Retrospective Comparative Outcomes Analysis.

    Ostomy/wound management·2018
    Same journal

    A Retrospective, Descriptive Analysis of Hospital-acquired Deep Tissue Injuries.

    Ostomy/wound management·2018
    Same journal

    Outcomes of a Quality Improvement Program to Reduce Hospital-acquired Pressure Ulcers in Pediatric Patients.

    Ostomy/wound management·2018
    Same journal

    Effect of Music Therapy on Pain Perception, Anxiety, and Opioid Use During Dressing Change Among Patients With Burns in India: A Quasi-experimental, Cross-over Pilot Study.

    Ostomy/wound management·2018
    See all related articles

    Standardizing support surfaces is crucial for patient care. Developing performance-based criteria for evaluating these surfaces will improve clinical decision-making and research consistency.

    Area of Science:

    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Rehabilitation Engineering
    • Materials Science

    Background:

    • Limited prospective, controlled clinical studies hinder understanding of support surface efficacy.
    • Lack of standardized information complicates healthcare professional decision-making regarding support surfaces.
    • Standardization is needed to facilitate reproducible clinical research and patient-centered care.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose a performance-based framework for classifying support surfaces.
    • To establish measurable, noninvasive parameters for evaluating support surface characteristics.
    • To enable informed clinical decisions and improve research methodologies for support surfaces.

    Main Methods:

    • Identification of key patient needs: comfort, postural control, and pressure management.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Selection of nine noninvasively measurable parameters for surface evaluation.
  • In-depth discussion of specific guidelines for each parameter: surface life expectancy, skin moisture/temperature control, pressure redistribution, service requirements, fail safety, infection, flammability, and friction.

    • Main Results:

    • A comprehensive set of nine performance-based criteria for support surface evaluation has been developed.
    • Guidelines for each parameter ensure objective and reproducible testing.
    • The proposed framework addresses critical aspects of support surface function.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardized testing and evaluation of support surfaces are essential for clinical practice.
    • This framework will empower clinicians to select appropriate surfaces based on evidence and patient outcomes.
    • Standardization will advance the design and implementation of controlled clinical studies in this field.