Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Tracking genetically engineered microorganisms in nature

J K Jansson1

  • 1Department of Biochemistry, Stockholm University, Sweden.

Current Opinion in Biotechnology
|June 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Microbes without borders: uniting societies for climate action.

mBio·2025
Same author

Microbes without borders: uniting societies for climate action.

FEMS microbiology ecology·2025
Same author

Metabolic and spatio-taxonomic response of uncultivated seafloor bacteria following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

The ISME journal·2017
Same author

MICROBIOME. A unified initiative to harness Earth's microbiomes.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2015
Same author

Stewards of a changing planet: commentaries from ISME13 Plenary Lecturers.

The ISME journal·2010
Same author

Development of compost maturity and Actinobacteria populations during full-scale composting of organic household waste.

Journal of applied microbiology·2007
Same journal

Microbial C1 assimilation pathways for chemical synthesis: from native metabolism to synthetic design.

Current opinion in biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Medicinal plants fermentation: current knowledge and perspectives.

Current opinion in biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Fermented foods: lessons learned from metagenomics.

Current opinion in biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Microfluidic platforms for the transient transfection of mammalian cells: recent developments and challenges.

Current opinion in biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Harvesting insights from recent advances in yeast genomics for predictable and precision wine fermentation.

Current opinion in biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Minimal enzyme cascades for the aromatic-to-aromatic upgrading of lignin monomers.

Current opinion in biotechnology·2026
See all related articles

New methods for tracking genetically engineered microorganisms in nature offer improved sensitivity and specificity. However, field trials still predominantly use older monitoring techniques, overlooking advanced, safer options.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental microbiology
  • Biotechnology
  • Molecular biology

Background:

  • Genetically engineered microorganisms (GEMs) are increasingly developed for environmental applications.
  • Effective monitoring is crucial for assessing the ecological impact and safety of GEMs.
  • Existing tracking methods face limitations in sensitivity, specificity, and quantitative accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent advancements in tracking methods for GEMs in environmental settings.
  • To highlight novel tagging strategies for bacteria intended for release.
  • To assess the adoption of advanced monitoring techniques in published field trials.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of recent publications on GEM tracking and tagging.
  • Analysis of methodologies used in reported environmental release field trials.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of conventional versus novel monitoring techniques for GEMs.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant progress has been made in developing more sensitive, specific, and quantitative tracking methods for GEMs.
    • Novel tagging techniques for environmental bacteria have been introduced.
    • A notable gap exists between available advanced monitoring technologies and their application in field studies, with conventional methods still prevalent.

    Conclusions:

    • Despite technological progress, the practical implementation of advanced GEM monitoring tools in field trials lags behind.
    • There is a need to encourage the adoption of improved, safer tracking methods for environmental risk assessment.
    • Future research should focus on bridging the gap between method development and real-world application in environmental biotechnology.