Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus single dosing. A comparative study

J A De Andrés1, E Febré, J Bellver

  • 1Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, General University Hospital, Valencia, Spain.

European Journal of Anaesthesiology
|March 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Continuous spinal anesthesia required more time but offered similar efficacy to single-dose spinal anesthesia for orthopedic surgery. Single-dose spinal anesthesia led to more frequent hypotension, while continuous spinal anesthesia had a higher rate of inadequate analgesia.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Female underweight and risk of ectopic pregnancy.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2020
Same author

ALWAYS ICSI? A SWOT analysis.

Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics·2020
Same author

Hysteroscopic septum resection and reproductive medicine: A SWOT analysis.

Reproductive biomedicine online·2018
Same author

[Comments to the article: "Endobronchial stent for the treatment of atraumatic rupture of the left bronchial due to a bull horn. Anesthetic implications"].

Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion·2014
Same author

Three-dimensional interactive model of lumbar spinal structures.

Anaesthesia·2014
Same author

Similar morphokinetic patterns in embryos derived from obese and normoweight infertile women: a time-lapse study.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2013

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology
  • Surgical Procedures

Background:

  • Spinal anesthesia is a common technique for orthopedic surgery.
  • Both continuous and single-dose spinal anesthesia methods are utilized, each with potential benefits and drawbacks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy, safety, and procedural aspects of continuous versus single-dose spinal anesthesia in orthopedic surgery patients.
  • To evaluate the incidence of inadequate analgesia and hypotension between the two spinal anesthesia techniques.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective randomized study involving 108 patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.
  • Continuous spinal anesthesia was administered via a 20-gauge catheter, while single-dose spinal anesthesia used a 24-gauge Sprotte needle.
  • Local anesthetic doses and segmental levels were recorded, along with procedure time, onset, efficacy, and complication rates.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Continuous spinal anesthesia took longer to administer (6.7 min vs. 4.9 min, P < 0.05).
  • Inadequate analgesia occurred in 11% of continuous spinal anesthesia patients versus 2% of single-dose patients (P = 0.18).
  • Hypotension was more frequent with single-dose spinal anesthesia (P < 0.05).

Conclusions:

  • Both continuous and single-dose spinal anesthesia are effective for orthopedic surgery, with similar onset and efficacy.
  • Continuous spinal anesthesia may be associated with a higher risk of inadequate analgesia, while single-dose techniques present a greater risk of hypotension.
  • The study highlights trade-offs between the two spinal anesthesia methods, with catheter manipulation correlating with analgesic failure in the continuous technique.