Related Experiment Videos
Immunomodulating IL-6 activity by murine monoclonal antibodies
J Brochier1, E Legouffe, J Liautard
1INSERM U291, Montpellier, France.
International Journal of Immunopharmacology
|January 1, 1995
Summary
The human anti-mouse immunoglobulin antibody (HAMA) response to anti-IL-6 therapy did not impact treatment efficacy. Anti-idiotype antibodies did not cause rapid clearance or functional inactivation of the therapeutic monoclonal antibody (MAb).
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Oncology
Background:
- Human anti-mouse immunoglobulin antibody (HAMA) responses are common with murine monoclonal antibody (MAb) therapies.
- Interleukin-6 (IL-6) plays a role in C-reactive protein (CRP) production and is a target for cancer treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the HAMA response in patients treated with B-E8, an anti-IL-6 MAb.
- To determine the impact of HAMA on B-E8 MAb pharmacokinetics and treatment efficacy in multiple myeloma (MM) and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRCC) patients.
Main Methods:
- Assessed HAMA development in 12 patients (6 MM, 6 MRCC) receiving B-E8 MAb.
- Monitored serum CRP levels as an indicator of IL-6 inhibition.
- Characterized HAMA specificity (anti-idiotype, anti-isotype) and its effect on B-E8 levels and function.
Main Results:
- Nine patients developed HAMA, including anti-idiotype antibodies.
- Two patients with anti-isotype HAMA experienced rapid B-E8 clearance and loss of treatment efficacy.
- Patients with only anti-idiotype HAMA maintained B-E8 levels and IL-6 inhibition, with MAb retaining binding and inhibitory functions.
Conclusions:
- HAMA against anti-IL-6 MAb idiotopes does not necessarily lead to MAb clearance or functional loss.
- Unlike HAMA against cell-targeting MAbs, anti-idiotype HAMA against anti-IL-6 MAbs did not compromise treatment efficacy in most patients.
- The specificity of the HAMA response is critical in determining its clinical impact on MAb therapy.