Related Experiment Videos
Laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis: past, present, and future
J E McGowan1, B Metchock, F S Nolte
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA 30335, USA.
Abstract:
Resurgence of tuberculosis justifies extraordinary efforts to expedite TB diagnosis and susceptibility testing. This demands that laboratory support expand to a "second generation" of methods and procedures, including rapid availability of fluorochrome smears of concentrated specimens, faster techniques for detection (e.g., the BACTEC radiometric broth system and microcolony detection), quicker identification (e.g., high-pressure liquid chromatography, nonisotopic genetic probes), more rapid susceptibility testing methods (e.g., BACTEC), and reporting of these results as critical values. Guidelines have been established for turnaround time for results of smears, TB organism identification, and susceptibility testing to usual first-line drugs. A "third generation" of laboratory techniques soon will make testing not only more effective but also more efficient. These methods include direct testing of respiratory specimens through nonisotopic genetic probes as well as nucleic acid amplification techniques utilizing polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and other molecular procedures. These new procedures and protocols place heavy demands on laboratory test volume, technologist time and costs. For the healthcare system or clinical laboratory without the resources to deal with these new demands, referral of TB specimens represents a reasonable alternative, as long as transport is adequate to meet current CDC and other guidelines for turnaround time.