Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Data analysis: statistical analysis and use of historical control data

J K Haseman1

  • 1Statistics and Biomathematics Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA.

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology : RTP
|February 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating consistency in the interpretation of NTP rodent cancer bioassays: an examination of mouse lung tumor effects in the 4-MEI study.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2013
Same author

Selecting the appropriate rodent diet for endocrine disruptor research and testing studies.

ILAR journal·2004
Same author

Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of microencapsulated trans-cinnamaldehyde in rats and mice.

Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association·2004
Same author

Prediction of rodent carcinogenesis: an evaluation of prechronic liver lesions as forecasters of liver tumors in NTP carcinogenicity studies.

Toxicologic pathology·2004
Same author

An alternative perspective: a critical evaluation of the Waddell threshold extrapolation model in chemical carcinogenesis.

Toxicologic pathology·2003
Same author

Photocarcinogenesis in the Tg.AC mouse: lomefloxacin and 8-methoxypsoralen.

Photochemistry and photobiology·2003

Statistical methods for analyzing rodent carcinogenicity study tumor data are discussed. Challenges include determining fatal vs. incidental tumors and using comparable historical control data for accurate interpretation.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Biostatistics
  • Carcinogenesis Research

Background:

  • Rodent carcinogenicity studies are crucial for assessing chemical safety.
  • Statistical analysis of tumor data presents unique challenges, including tumor lethality determination.
  • Interpreting results requires robust methodologies and consideration of historical data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe survival-adjusted statistical methods for analyzing tumor data from long-term rodent carcinogenicity studies.
  • To discuss challenges in tumor classification (fatal vs. incidental) and data analysis.
  • To explore the utility and limitations of historical control data in study interpretation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of survival-adjusted statistical methods for tumor data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of approaches to address difficulties in classifying tumors as fatal or incidental.
  • Examination of factors influencing tumor incidence and comparability of historical control data.

    • Main Results:

    • Several statistical methods are available for analyzing tumor data, but require tumor classification.
    • Establishing a comparable historical control database is a significant challenge.
    • Variability in tumor incidence is influenced by animal room environment, diet, necropsy, and histopathology.

    Conclusions:

    • Accurate statistical analysis of rodent carcinogenicity studies necessitates careful consideration of tumor lethality and historical control data.
    • The comparability of historical control data is paramount for reliable interpretation.
    • Standardization of study conditions and diagnostic procedures is essential to minimize variability.