Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cervical screening in general practice

D A Pritchard1, J A Straton, J Hyndman

  • 1Department of General Practice, University of Western Australia, Perth.

Australian Journal of Public Health
|April 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Transfer variables in tracking skills.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Recovery of lost transfer effects.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

The characteristics and application of flashtubes.

Illuminating engineering·2010
Same author

The relationship between demographic and health-related factors on dental service attendance by older Australians.

British dental journal·2004
Same author

Normative corrections for the Halstead Reitan Neuropsychological Battery.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2003
Same author

Performance scales for the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery-Form I.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2003
Same journal

Cost containment, drugs and community health.

Australian journal of public health·1995
Same journal

Australia's role in HIV prevention in the developing world.

Australian journal of public health·1995
Same journal

Vaccination policies and practices.

Australian journal of public health·1995
Same journal

The traditional humoral food habits of pregnant Vietnamese-Australian women and their effect on birth weight.

Australian journal of public health·1995
Same journal

Food intakes of adult Melbourne Chinese.

Australian journal of public health·1995
Same journal

Family planning: personal and political perspectives from Choiseul Province, Solomon Islands.

Australian journal of public health·1995
See all related articles

Mailed invitations significantly increased Pap smear uptake in general practice compared to no intervention. While a dedicated screening clinic was positively received, its attendance was insufficient for private practice viability.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Preventive Medicine
  • General Practice

Background:

  • Cervical cancer screening via Pap smears is crucial for early detection.
  • General practices play a key role in delivering screening services.
  • Optimizing intervention strategies is essential to improve screening rates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of three interventions in increasing Pap smear uptake among women in a general practice setting.
  • To compare the impact of reminder systems, mailed invitations, and dedicated screening clinics on screening participation.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 757 women aged 36-69.
  • Interventions included: tagging medical records for doctor reminders, sending appointment invitations, and offering appointments at a women-staffed screening clinic.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Pap smear uptake was compared between intervention groups and a control group.

    • Main Results:

    • Mailed invitations (appointment letter and letter-only) significantly increased Pap smear uptake compared to the control group (OR 2.13 and 1.67, respectively).
    • Tagging medical records did not significantly improve Pap smear rates.
    • Women attending the screening clinic reported positive experiences, but attendance was insufficient for viability.

    Conclusions:

    • Mailed invitations are an effective strategy for enhancing Pap smear screening in general practices.
    • Dedicated screening clinics may improve patient experience but require adequate attendance for sustainability.
    • Further research into cost-effective and scalable interventions is warranted.