Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pooled population parameter from mark-recapture data

J W Hargrove1, C H Borland

  • 1Department of Veterinary Services, ODA Insect Pest Management Initiative, Causeway, Zimbabwe.

Biometrics
|December 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improved models for the relationship between age and the probability of trypanosome infection in female tsetse, <i>Glossina pallidipes</i> Austen.

Bulletin of entomological research·2023
Same author

Improved estimates of abortion rates in tsetse (Glossina spp.).

Medical and veterinary entomology·2023
Same author

Negative density-dependent dispersal in tsetse (Glossina spp): red flag or red herring?

Medical and veterinary entomology·2020
Same author

A model for the relationship between wing fray and chronological and ovarian ages in tsetse (Glossina spp).

Medical and veterinary entomology·2020
Same author

Modelling optimal timing and frequency of insecticide sprays for eradication or knockdown of closed populations of tsetse flies Glossina spp. (Diptera: Glossinidae).

Medical and veterinary entomology·2020
Same author

Estimating tsetse fertility: daily averaging versus periodic larviposition.

Medical and veterinary entomology·2019
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

The reduced capture history (RCH) method provides unbiased estimates for population, birth, and survival rates in capture-recapture studies. Alternative RCH estimates reduce bias for mortality and capture probabilities up to 60%.

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Population Dynamics
  • Wildlife Biology

Background:

  • Capture-recapture methods are crucial for estimating wildlife population parameters.
  • The reduced capture history (RCH) method simplifies data compilation from complete capture histories.
  • Assessing the accuracy and biases of RCH estimates is essential for reliable ecological inference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To calculate and analyze biases in RCH estimates for all parameters within the Jolly-Seber (J-S) model for stationary populations.
  • To verify these bias calculations through simulation.
  • To derive alternative RCH estimates with reduced or no detectable bias.

Main Methods:

  • Compilation of reduced capture histories (RCH) from complete capture histories of uniquely marked animals.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Calculation of biases for RCH estimates of Jolly-Seber (J-S) model parameters.
  • Simulation studies to verify calculated biases.
  • Derivation of alternative RCH estimation procedures.

    • Main Results:

    • Biases in RCH estimates are functions of survival, capture probabilities, and pooling degree.
    • For probabilities not exceeding 50% per pooling interval, biases for population size, birth rate, survival rate, and capture probability are <5%.
    • Marked population, marked fraction, and recapture probability require iterative estimation from bias formulae.
    • Alternative estimates show no detectable bias for mortality and capture probability up to 60% per pooling period.

    Conclusions:

    • The RCH method provides reliable estimates for key population parameters under moderate capture and mortality probabilities.
    • Alternative RCH estimation strategies can mitigate bias in scenarios with higher probabilities.
    • While alternative estimates may have slightly higher variances, they offer improved accuracy for critical ecological parameters.