Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
What are Estimates?01:06

What are Estimates?

It isn't easy to measure a parameter such as the mean height or the mean weight of a population. So, we draw samples from the population and calculate the mean height or mean weight of the individuals in the sample. This sample data acts as a representative measure of the population parameter. These sample statistics are known as estimates. 
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such as the mean,...
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the Guinness...
Bias01:22

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different reasons...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On the asymptotic validity of confidence sets for linear functionals of solutions to integral equations.

Biometrika·2025
Same author

Association of Isolated Congenital Heart Disease with Fetal Brain Maturation.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2020
Same author

Multiple robustness in factorized likelihood models.

Biometrika·2018
Same author

Estimation of the effect of interventions that modify the received treatment.

Statistics in medicine·2013
Same author

On protected estimation of an odds ratio model with missing binary exposure and confounders.

Biometrika·2012
Same author

Evaluating building-related symptoms using the US EPA BASE study results.

Indoor air·2008

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 26, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

A note on the bias of estimators with missing data

A Rotnitzky1, D Wypij

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.

Biometrics
|December 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Standard statistical analyses can yield biased estimates with missing data. This study provides a method to calculate the asymptotic bias for estimators using incomplete data, aiding accurate analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Statistical Inference
  • Missing Data Analysis

Background:

  • Standard statistical methods like maximum likelihood estimation and generalized estimating equations can produce biased results when data are incomplete.
  • Understanding and quantifying bias due to missing observations is crucial for reliable statistical inference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify a condition that determines the limit in probability of estimators derived from incomplete data.
  • To develop a straightforward algorithm for computing the asymptotic bias of these estimators, particularly for discrete data.
  • To demonstrate the practical application of the proposed method using real-world asthma prevalence data.

Main Methods:

  • Derivation of a theoretical condition for the asymptotic behavior of estimators solved from incomplete data estimating equations.

More Related Videos

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 26, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

  • Development of a computational algorithm based on this condition for discrete data.
  • Application and illustration of the algorithm using asthma prevalence data.
  • Main Results:

    • A condition is established that characterizes the probability limit of estimators computed from incomplete data.
    • A simple algorithm is proposed for calculating the asymptotic bias of these estimators.
    • The method is shown to be implementable with existing statistical software and effective in analyzing asthma prevalence data.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed method offers a way to quantify bias in statistical analyses with missing data.
    • The developed algorithm provides a practical tool for researchers to assess and correct for bias.
    • This approach enhances the reliability of statistical findings in the presence of missing observations, as demonstrated in epidemiological studies.