Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quantifying improvement with amplification

R Chmiel1, J Jerger

  • 1Division of Audiology and Speech Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

Ear and Hearing
|April 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Milestones and Boundaries.

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

Face-to-Face.

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

Audiologic findings in an unusual case of eighth nerve lesion.

Research report. Naval School of Aviation Medicine (U.S.)·2014
Same author

Auditory asymmetry.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2002
Same author

How loud is too loud?

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2001
Same author

Are the benefits worth the cost?

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2001
Same journal

Community-Informed Adaptation of a School-Based Hearing Health Intervention: Formative Evaluation for an Effectiveness-Implementation Trial.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Hearing Difficulty, Health Literacy, and Poorer Health Among Adults in the United States: 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Cultural Differences in Listening Environments Between Hispanic and White Non-Hispanic Cochlear Implant Users.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Detection of Inner Ear Malformations Based on Simple Anatomical Measurements: A Model Approach.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Avoiding Cisplatin-Related Hearing Loss, Including Implementing Sodium Thiosulfate as Otoprotectant Into Daily Pediatric Clinical Practice: Proceedings Based on Evidence and Expert Opinion From the Ototoxicity Taskforce of the SIOP Supportive Care Network.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Quantifying Miscommunications in Triadic Conversations: Effects of Hearing Impairment, Hearing Aids, and Background Noise.

Ear and hearing·2026
See all related articles

The randomization test offers a flexible statistical method to assess speech understanding interventions for hearing-impaired individuals. This approach enables personalized treatment recommendations by analyzing individual patient performance data.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Speech-Language Pathology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Evaluating speech understanding interventions requires robust statistical methods.
  • Existing methods may lack flexibility for diverse clinical scenarios and patient populations.

Observation:

  • A nonparametric randomization test was applied to assess speech understanding.
  • The test evaluated various interventions including monaural vs. binaural amplification, conventional aids vs. assistive listening devices, and cochlear implants with or without visual cues.
  • Data from five clinical patients were analyzed.

Findings:

  • The randomization test demonstrated flexibility in evaluating diverse speech understanding measures.
  • The statistical approach allowed for individual subject-level performance analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Efficacy of different hearing intervention strategies was statistically quantified.

    • Implications:

    • This statistical method supports accountability in recommending hearing interventions.
    • It facilitates personalized treatment strategies for hearing-impaired individuals.
    • The randomization test provides a valuable tool for clinical research and practice in audiology.