Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing depth from motion with depth from binocular disparity

F H Durgin1, D R Proffitt, T J Olson

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|June 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceiving geographical slant.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

An fMRI study of imagined self-rotation.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2002
Same author

Seeing mountains in mole hills: geographical-slant perception.

Psychological science·2001
Same author

Two memories for geographical slant: separation and interdependence of action and awareness.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2001
Same author

Imagining physically impossible self-rotations: geometry is more important than gravity.

Cognition·2001
Same author

Visual aftereffects of sequential perception: dynamic adaptation to changes in texture density and contrast.

Vision research·2001
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

This study investigated depth perception accuracy using binocular disparity and structure from motion. Binocular disparity yielded accurate depth judgments, while motion cues showed poor quantitative depth recovery.

Area of Science:

  • Visual Perception
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Depth perception is crucial for navigating and interacting with the environment.
  • Binocular disparity and structure from motion are key visual cues for depth estimation.
  • Understanding the relative accuracy of these cues is important for visual science.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy of depth judgments derived from binocular disparity versus structure from motion.
  • To investigate the quantitative recovery of depth information from different visual cues.
  • To examine depth constancy under controlled viewing conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using computer simulations and real objects.
  • Depth judgments were recorded based on binocular disparity, motion parallax, object rotation, and stereokinesis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Monocular depth cues were minimized in the third experiment to isolate stereoscopic depth constancy.

    • Main Results:

    • Judgments based on binocular disparity were highly accurate in both simulated and real environments.
    • Depth judgments relying on motion cues (motion parallax, object rotation) showed poor quantitative depth recovery.
    • Stereoscopic depth constancy was demonstrated for distances between 1 to 3 meters.

    Conclusions:

    • Binocular disparity is a more reliable cue for accurate quantitative depth perception than structure from motion.
    • Motion cues, despite being robust, are less effective for precise depth recovery.
    • Stereoscopic vision provides stable depth perception across a range of distances under specific conditions.