Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

MRI segmentation: methods and applications

L P Clarke1, R P Velthuizen, M A Camacho

  • 1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prevention of delayed avulsion.

British dental journal·2023
Same author

An Assessment of Imaging Informatics for Precision Medicine in Cancer.

Yearbook of medical informatics·2017
Same author

Intelligence and eeg measures of information flow: efficiency and homeostatic neuroplasticity.

Scientific reports·2016
Same author

Calibrated breast density methods for full field digital mammography: a system for serial quality control and inter-system generalization.

Medical physics·2015
Same author

Amelogenesis imperfecta associated with dental follicular-like hamartomas and generalised gingival enlargement.

European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry·2013
Same author

Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast composition descriptors: automated measurement development for full field digital mammography.

Medical physics·2013
Same journal

Incremental diagnostic value of microstructural time-dependent diffusion MRI in differentiating PCNSL from glioblastoma over conventional MRI.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2026
Same journal

Enhanced motion compensation for free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with GROG-facilitated bunch phase encoding and Golden angle radial sampling.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2026
Same journal

The allegory of the cave: 10 years of AI shadows in radiology.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2026
Same journal

Conversion of 3 T liver, spleen, pancreas, and kidney R2* measurements to 1.5 T R2* equivalents: Validation of a theoretical framework.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2026
Same journal

Cine-derived mitral annular relaxation velocity for detection of preclinical left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2026
Same journal

Bone marrow fat fraction and R2* in sickle cell disease: Associations with hemolysis, iron metabolism, and disease severity.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2026
See all related articles

This review examines magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) segmentation techniques, comparing single-image and multispectral, supervised and unsupervised methods. It highlights challenges in tumor volume measurement due to observer variability in supervised approaches.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Image Analysis
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) segmentation is crucial for quantitative analysis.
  • Various techniques exist, each with distinct advantages and limitations.
  • Accurate segmentation impacts clinical decision-making and research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively review current MRI segmentation methodologies.
  • To compare the efficacy of different segmentation approaches.
  • To highlight challenges in applying these methods, particularly for tumor volume assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of MRI segmentation techniques.
  • Analysis of single-image vs. multispectral segmentation.
  • Comparison of supervised vs. unsupervised learning methods.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of image pre-processing, registration, and validation.

    • Main Results:

    • Supervised methods offer detailed control but are prone to inter- and intra-observer variability.
    • Unsupervised methods provide automation but may lack specificity.
    • Multispectral segmentation can improve accuracy over single-image methods.
    • Validation remains a critical step for all segmentation techniques.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of MRI segmentation method depends on the specific application and desired accuracy.
    • Observer variability is a significant challenge for supervised methods in clinical practice.
    • Further research is needed to develop robust and reproducible segmentation techniques.