Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Euthanasia. Definitions and debate

J Martin

    Nursing Times
    |May 17, 1995
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This paper examines the history of euthanasia, including active and passive interventions and advocacy organizations. It explores public opinion and the ethical considerations for patients and medical practitioners.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Two related genes encoding extremely hydrophobic proteins suppress a lethal mutation in the yeast mitochondrial processing enhancing protein.

    The Journal of biological chemistry·1992
    Same author

    Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: GroES binds to one end of the GroEL cylinder, which accommodates the protein substrate within its central cavity.

    The EMBO journal·1992
    Same author

    Effect on sensitisation of giving HLA-DR-matched blood to potential renal transplant recipients.

    Transplantation proceedings·1992
    Same author

    Autolymphocyte therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: initial clinical results from 335 patients treated in a multisite clinical practice.

    Transplantation proceedings·1992
    Same author

    Prevention of protein denaturation under heat stress by the chaperonin Hsp60.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·1992
    Same author

    Routine quantitative analysis of brain and cerebrospinal fluid spaces with MR imaging.

    Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·1992
    Same journal

    'The little things count': delivering dignified care.

    Nursing times·2018
    Same journal

    The heart of the hospital.

    Nursing times·2018
    Same journal

    The nurse's role in caring for people with dementia.

    Nursing times·2018
    Same journal

    Hepatitis C and the ongoing challenge of genotype 3.

    Nursing times·2018
    Same journal

    Implementing change in older people's acute care.

    Nursing times·2018
    Same journal

    A total health economy approach to revalidation.

    Nursing times·2018
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • History of Medicine
    • Sociology of Health

    Background:

    • Euthanasia, encompassing both active and passive interventions, has a complex history.
    • The evolution of organizations advocating for or supporting euthanasia is a significant societal development.
    • Public perception and legal/ethical frameworks surrounding euthanasia are critical areas of study.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To provide a comprehensive historical overview of euthanasia.
    • To analyze the development and role of euthanasia advocacy groups.
    • To explore public opinion and the rights of patients and healthcare providers in relation to euthanasia.

    Main Methods:

    • Historical analysis of euthanasia origins and development.
    • Review of literature on euthanasia advocacy organizations.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of public opinion surveys and ethical/legal discourse on patient and practitioner rights.

    • Main Results:

    • The paper traces the historical trajectory of euthanasia, detailing active and passive forms.
    • It documents the emergence and influence of various organizations involved in the euthanasia debate.
    • Analysis reveals diverse public opinions and ongoing discussions regarding patient autonomy and practitioner responsibilities.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding the history and evolution of euthanasia is crucial for contemporary ethical and legal debates.
    • The role of advocacy groups significantly shapes public discourse and policy development.
    • Balancing patient rights with professional ethics remains a central challenge in the euthanasia discussion.