Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Presentation of comparative audit data

G D Murray1, C Hayes, S Fowler

  • 1Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, UK.

The British Journal of Surgery
|March 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evidence for the Collective Nature of Radial Flow in Pb+Pb Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Evidence for the Dimuon Decay of the Higgs Boson in pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Asthma Exacerbations Requiring ICU: Risk Factors and Challenges in Management.

Irish medical journal·2025
Same author

Evidence for Longitudinally Polarized W Bosons in the Electroweak Production of Same-Sign W Boson Pairs in Association with Two Jets in pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Conservative management of perforation of a duodenal diverticulum.

Irish medical journal·2025
Same author

Observation of tt[over ¯] Production in Pb+Pb Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.02  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same journal

Trimester-Specific Safety of Laparoscopic versus Open Abdominal Surgery During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The British journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

The Gut Microbiome in Surgical Oncology: Mechanisms, Perioperative Outcomes, and Therapeutic Opportunities.

The British journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Patient-led, home-based follow-up for colorectal cancer: the DISTANCE multicentre stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial.

The British journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Correction to: Reduced secretory efficiency in parathyroid carcinoma: diagnostic value of the PTH-to-tumour-volume ratio.

The British journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Global disparities in hepatocellular carcinoma outcomes: multicentre study.

The British journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Surgical Outcomes from Nationwide Implementation of the International Best-Practice for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (PREOPANC-4) study.

The British journal of surgery·2026
See all related articles

A new statistical approach improves surgical audit data by accounting for patient complexity (case mix). This method reveals significant differences in surgeon performance, highlighting the inadequacy of unadjusted mortality rates for comparisons.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Audit
  • Statistical Modeling
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • The Royal College of Surgeons of England conducts a voluntary comparative audit for general surgical fellows.
  • Current audit data presentation is descriptive, neglecting statistical variability and case mix differences.
  • This limits the accurate comparison of surgical performance among participants.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel statistical modeling approach for presenting comparative surgical audit data.
  • To adjust for case mix variations among general surgical fellows.
  • To enhance the credibility and interpretability of audit findings.

Main Methods:

  • Development and application of a statistical model to adjust for case mix effects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized data from 136,203 admissions reported by 110 surgeons.
  • Compared unadjusted mortality rates with case-mix-adjusted performance metrics.

    • Main Results:

    • Adjusting for case mix significantly altered the relative performance rankings of surgeons.
    • Unadjusted mortality rates were found to be a crude and potentially misleading measure of performance.
    • The new approach demonstrated substantial shifts in performance evaluation.

    Conclusions:

    • Statistical modeling of case mix is crucial for accurate comparative surgical audits.
    • The proposed method enhances the credibility of audit data by quantifying strengths and limitations.
    • Further development of statistical models is recommended for improved surgical quality assessment.