Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2026

12:10
Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Published on: May 19, 2022
Risk-adjusted analysis of surgeon performance: a 1-year study
G P Copeland1, P Sagar, J Brennan
1Warrington Hospital NHS Trust, Cheshire, UK.
The British Journal of Surgery
|March 1, 1995
Summary
Comparing surgeon performance requires careful analysis beyond raw statistics. The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) system offers a more accurate method for monitoring surgical quality.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Quality Assessment
- Health Services Research
- Patient Safety
Background:
- Surgeon performance evaluation is crucial for maintaining high standards in healthcare.
- Traditional methods of comparing surgeon outcomes using raw mortality and morbidity rates can be misleading.
- The need for a more objective and risk-adjusted system for assessing surgical quality is evident.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reliability of raw mortality and morbidity statistics for comparing individual surgeon performance.
- To introduce and assess the utility of the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) scoring system in quality assessment.
- To demonstrate an improved method for monitoring surgeon performance and identifying potential disparities.
Main Methods:
- A 1-year prospective analysis of non-day-case general surgery patients (n=3004) in a district general hospital.
- Application of the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) scoring system to assess patient risk.
- Calculation of the observed to expected (O:E) ratio for mortality and morbidity for each surgeon to adjust for patient complexity.
Main Results:
- Raw mortality rates varied significantly (1.0-4.9%), but O:E ratios showed a narrower range (0.83-1.06), indicating risk adjustment is necessary.
- Morbidity rates also demonstrated considerable variation (5.3-12.6%), with O:E ratios ranging from 0.86-1.02.
- The study highlights the potential for significant misunderstanding and misinterpretation of 'league tables' based on uncorrected data.
Conclusions:
- Raw mortality and morbidity data are inadequate and potentially hazardous for comparing surgeon performance.
- The POSSUM scoring system and O:E ratios provide a more accurate and equitable method for monitoring surgical quality.
- Accurate monitoring of surgeon performance is essential to avoid misinterpretations and ensure patient safety.
