Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

From geons to structure. A note on object representation

E Leeuwenberg1, P Van der Helm, R Van Lier

  • 1Nijmegen Institute for Cognition and Information, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Perception
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Learning to echolocate in sighted people: a correlational study on attention, working memory and spatial abilities.

Experimental brain research·2016
Same author

A code-theoretical note on object handedness.

Perception·2000
Same author

Separate features versus one principle: comment on Shimaya (1997).

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2000
Same author

Representation versus process in simplicity of serial pattern completion.

Cognitive psychology·2000
Same author

Investigating global effects in visual occlusion: from a partly occluded square to the back of a tree-trunk.

Acta psychologica·1999
Same author

Effects of physical connectivity on the representational unity of multi-part configurations.

Cognition·1999
Same journal

Predictive models and parameter analysis for multiple tactile perceptions in skin-wet fabrics interface.

Perception·2026
Same journal

High-resolution kitsch by AI: Why society needs art, not more AI content.

Perception·2026
Same journal

Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

Perception·2026
Same journal

Interoception, alexithymia, and motor congruency: Psychological drivers of body ownership in virtual reality.

Perception·2026
See all related articles

Object perception models Recognition by Components (RBC) and Structural Information Theory (SIT) were compared. SIT aligns better with object regularity, improving classification predictions, while RBC offers a broader process view.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Computer Vision

Background:

  • Object perception models explain how humans recognize objects.
  • Recognition by Components (RBC) decomposes objects into basic shapes (geons).
  • Structural Information Theory (SIT) emphasizes object regularities for interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Compare RBC and SIT models of object perception.
  • Evaluate object representation and underlying assumptions.
  • Determine which model better predicts object classification.

Main Methods:

  • Analyzed object decomposition strategies in RBC and SIT.
  • Examined definitions of object axes and their relation to regularity.
  • Investigated viewpoint invariance in feature identification for geons.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Object representations aligning with SIT's regularity principle better predict classification.
  • Geon identification relies on object regularity, not viewpoint invariance.
  • RBC models the perceptual process; SIT models the interpretation outcome.

Conclusions:

  • SIT's focus on regularity offers superior object classification predictive power.
  • Object regularity, not viewpoint invariance, drives feature recognition.
  • RBC and SIT offer complementary insights into object perception.