Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Extra-oral prosthetics: past and present

J M van Doorne1

  • 1Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care Research Group, Utrecht University Hospital, The Netherlands.

Journal of Investigative Surgery : the Official Journal of the Academy of Surgical Research
|July 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spinal complications in osteogenesis imperfecta: 47 patients 1-16 years of age.

Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica·1998
Same author

Facial disfigurement after cancer resection: a problem with an extra dimension.

Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research·1994
Same author

[History of maxillofacial prosthetics].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde·1993
Same author

Craniofacial dysostosis, hypertrichosis, genital hypoplasia, ocular, dental, and digital defects: confirmation of the Gorlin-Chaudhry-Moss syndrome.

American journal of medical genetics·1992
Same author

A cephalometric study in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome.

Journal of craniofacial genetics and developmental biology·1991
Same author

Oral aspects of Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome.

American journal of medical genetics. Supplement·1990

Maxillofacial prosthetics reconstruct head and neck defects, often from tumor removal. Dental implants offer improved retention solutions for facial prostheses (epitheses), enhancing patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Maxillofacial prosthetics
  • Biomaterials science
  • Craniofacial surgery

Background:

  • Maxillofacial prosthetics addresses the reconstruction of missing head and neck tissues.
  • Prosthetic replacements for external body parts are called epitheses.
  • Historically, defects stemmed from trauma; currently, tumor resection and congenital anomalies are primary causes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the role of implants in improving the retention of maxillofacial prostheses.
  • To explore solutions for the long-standing problem of prosthetic device retention.

Main Methods:

  • Case study examination
  • Review of historical and current applications of maxillofacial prostheses
  • Analysis of implant-supported retention techniques

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Implants significantly enhance the stability and retention of facial prostheses.
  • Successful case examples demonstrate the efficacy of implant-retained epitheses.
  • Addressing retention issues improves functional and aesthetic outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Implant-supported prostheses represent a significant advancement in maxillofacial rehabilitation.
  • The integration of implants provides a reliable solution for prosthetic retention challenges.
  • Further research into implant materials and surgical techniques can optimize patient care.